Starting 2025, South Korea's cracking down on AI-generated ads in a way that could reshape digital marketing. Advertisers will be legally required to slap clear labels on anything created with artificial intelligence—think deepfaked celebrity endorsements or fabricated "experts" pushing supplements and sketchy products.
The move comes as authorities grapple with an explosion of deceptive promotions. We're talking fake doctors recommending miracle cures, AI-cloned influencers hawking questionable food products, you name it. The line between real and synthetic has gotten dangerously blurry.
What's interesting here? This isn't just about consumer protection—it's a signal that regulators are finally catching up to generative AI's potential for manipulation. Whether it's fake testimonials or entirely fabricated scenarios, the tech's been weaponized for profit.
For the Web3 crowd, there's a parallel worth noting. Just as deepfakes can trick consumers in traditional advertising, AI-generated content poses similar risks in crypto marketing—fake founder videos, synthetic project endorsements, fabricated community testimonials. South Korea's approach might preview how other jurisdictions tackle AI transparency requirements across digital assets and decentralized platforms.
The regulation's teeth remain to be seen, but mandatory disclosure is step one. Whether enforcement keeps pace with AI's evolution? That's the real test.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeePhobia
· 12-13 18:29
Korea's move is ruthless, sending a warning to the crypto world... The part about fake founder videos was spot on; such incidents are quite common in crypto...
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 12-13 09:06
Honestly, Korea's move is a bit late. The crypto scene has already been completely overwhelmed by AI deepfake... Are tags useful?
View OriginalReply0
MiningDisasterSurvivor
· 12-12 06:58
South Korea is really taking this move... To be honest, I've been waiting for this day for a long time. I remember back in 2018, so many projects used AI face-swapping celebrity endorsements, and the retail investors rushed in one after another. Now they’re finally going to start labeling, but I just want to ask—can their execution keep up? This kind of regulation is usually all talk and no action.
On the Web3 side, it’s even more upsetting—fake founder videos, synthetic endorsements, fake community feedback... This is the usual routine now. The move by South Korea suggests that other countries will have to follow suit? Those exchanges and project teams should be sweating; the days of making big promises might really be coming to an end.
Just labeling isn’t enough, the key is whether they can actually catch the violators; otherwise, it’s just a game of change the soup without changing the medicine. Anyway, I don’t believe that "mandatory disclosure" can fundamentally change anything. I’ve seen markets stay bearish for so long.
View OriginalReply0
RatioHunter
· 12-10 19:03
Korea's move is aggressive; they are directly enforcing mandatory tagging. But I bet five dollars that law enforcement can't keep up with AI iteration speed at all.
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 12-10 19:02
ngl Korea's recent moves are interesting. The label system sounds simple in theory but execution... well, let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
governance_lurker
· 12-10 18:54
NGL, Korea's move may seem simple, but its impact on the crypto circle is significant... Once the tagging system is implemented, fake project promotions will be directly discredited
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420
· 12-10 18:42
NGL, Korea's move is ruthless. Once the tagging system is implemented with enforcement, it can really block these scammers... The pile of fake founder videos in the crypto circle should have been dealt with long ago.
View OriginalReply0
AllTalkLongTrader
· 12-10 18:39
South Korea's recent move has hit the nail on the head; deepfake advertising definitely needs regulation.
The practice of AI face-swapping for selling products has been widespread in the crypto world for a long time. Finally, someone is taking action.
Can regulators keep up with the rapid iteration of AI? That's the key... Let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
IfIWereOnChain
· 12-10 18:38
South Korea's move was the right one, the crypto community should learn from it. Nowadays, project teams can easily throw out an AI video to scam a wave of people. Regulations didn't come early enough.
View OriginalReply0
0xSunnyDay
· 12-10 18:35
NGL, Korea's recent moves are quite aggressive, but to be honest, can tags really control scammers? Fake videos and photos in the crypto space are still everywhere.
Starting 2025, South Korea's cracking down on AI-generated ads in a way that could reshape digital marketing. Advertisers will be legally required to slap clear labels on anything created with artificial intelligence—think deepfaked celebrity endorsements or fabricated "experts" pushing supplements and sketchy products.
The move comes as authorities grapple with an explosion of deceptive promotions. We're talking fake doctors recommending miracle cures, AI-cloned influencers hawking questionable food products, you name it. The line between real and synthetic has gotten dangerously blurry.
What's interesting here? This isn't just about consumer protection—it's a signal that regulators are finally catching up to generative AI's potential for manipulation. Whether it's fake testimonials or entirely fabricated scenarios, the tech's been weaponized for profit.
For the Web3 crowd, there's a parallel worth noting. Just as deepfakes can trick consumers in traditional advertising, AI-generated content poses similar risks in crypto marketing—fake founder videos, synthetic project endorsements, fabricated community testimonials. South Korea's approach might preview how other jurisdictions tackle AI transparency requirements across digital assets and decentralized platforms.
The regulation's teeth remain to be seen, but mandatory disclosure is step one. Whether enforcement keeps pace with AI's evolution? That's the real test.