Recently played a blockchain game and finally saw something different.
Shatterpoint’s project, my first impression is — finally, a team that takes the game itself seriously.
Solid combat feel, hardcore mechanics, clear growth path. Not messing around with flashy gimmicks, just pure skill and understanding. Want to cheat your way to victory? Not gonna happen.
But what concerns me more is their economic system. Transparent to the point of being almost strict.
The Sparks points earned in each battle are not just empty promises. After the TGE launches, these points will be fully converted into $POINT tokens at a fixed ratio. The rules are clear, data is traceable, no wordplay.
Nowadays, making a game truly fun is already difficult, and even fewer are willing to be serious about the economic model. Shatterpoint at least tries to do both — first make players want to play, then see if it’s worth sticking around.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasGuru
· 21h ago
The transparent economic system is indeed rare, but it still depends on how the actual liquidity of $POINT will be after TGE.
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperer
· 12-11 11:39
wait hold up, let me actually examine the contract real quick because "transparent to nearly harsh" is doing a lot of lifting here
Reply0
ClassicDumpster
· 12-10 19:08
Finally seeing a team that isn't just trying to scam money feels really great
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSurvivor
· 12-10 19:05
Finally, a team that doesn't just hype the economic model anymore. This is what blockchain games should look like.
View OriginalReply0
GasWrangler
· 12-10 19:02
ngl, if you actually analyze the tokenomics here, the sparks-to-$POINT conversion is mathematically elegant but empirically we need to see the mempool behavior post-tge. most projects claim transparency then do the classic bait-and-switch on priority fees. shatterpoint might be different, but demonstrably false promises are still the baseline in this space, not the exception.
Reply0
ForumLurker
· 12-10 18:46
Finally seeing a project that takes the economic model seriously, not just hype.
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperer
· 12-10 18:44
Finally, I see a team that is not purely here to scalp profits, and the transparency of this economic model really exposes a lot of face.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictim
· 12-10 18:41
Finally, someone is treating blockchain games as games. It's quite rare to see something that isn't just a pure money grab.
Recently played a blockchain game and finally saw something different.
Shatterpoint’s project, my first impression is — finally, a team that takes the game itself seriously.
Solid combat feel, hardcore mechanics, clear growth path. Not messing around with flashy gimmicks, just pure skill and understanding. Want to cheat your way to victory? Not gonna happen.
But what concerns me more is their economic system. Transparent to the point of being almost strict.
The Sparks points earned in each battle are not just empty promises. After the TGE launches, these points will be fully converted into $POINT tokens at a fixed ratio. The rules are clear, data is traceable, no wordplay.
Nowadays, making a game truly fun is already difficult, and even fewer are willing to be serious about the economic model. Shatterpoint at least tries to do both — first make players want to play, then see if it’s worth sticking around.