Recently, I came across a new project in the privacy track called ZKAP, which focuses on anonymous transactions. After reviewing the fundamentals, I found that the official website and social media are all operating normally, and the team is at least working diligently.
This stage is still quite early; the internal market progress is only around 94%, and the liquidity pool is approximately 13 BNB in size. Honestly, with this pool depth, even a small amount of funds can make you a whale.
The privacy coin sector has always had demand, but market attention fluctuates between high and low. If the team can maintain steady progress, there is some room for imagination. However, early-stage projects carry significant risks, and volatility can be substantial.
If you're interested, you can research the project's background and technical solutions yourself. Don't rush just because the pool is small; make sure you understand what the team is doing. Early participation does have a first-mover advantage, but only if the project is reliable.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
airdrop_huntress
· 23h ago
The moat is so shallow; any random whale entering would cause a dump. I'm still a bit hesitant about such early-stage risks.
However, there are still opportunities in the privacy track, depending on how the team operates moving forward.
View OriginalReply0
SighingCashier
· 23h ago
Is the pool only 13 BNB? Isn't this just a big player training game haha
---
The privacy coin track has always been like this. When policy winds blow, it cools down; when it heats up again, it cycles back and forth.
---
It's good that the team is serious about their work, but 99% of projects in the early stages are quite earnest. The true test comes later.
---
Whether it's reliable or not, we'll see in half a year.
---
So the question is, what are the technical highlights of ZKAP? Otherwise, how does it differentiate from other privacy coins?
---
Those who want to become big players can go for it. Anyway, it's just that much money, and both big profits and big losses are acceptable.
---
There is indeed demand for anonymous transactions, but the regulatory hurdle must be crossed to proceed.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHobo
· 23h ago
Is the pool only 13 BNB? Isn't this a breeding ground for big players? LOL
---
Privacy coins are back; can this time beat Monero?
---
It's early days, but don't be fooled by the small pool size. The key is whether the team is reliable.
---
I don't know why, but the privacy coin track always feels a bit suspicious, but there's definitely a market.
---
What does 94% progress mean? Are they holding back a big move for the remaining 6%?
---
Having potential for growth is one thing, but I need to see if the code has been audited first.
---
Anonymous transactions? Let's see if this can survive regulatory scrutiny before getting excited.
Recently, I came across a new project in the privacy track called ZKAP, which focuses on anonymous transactions. After reviewing the fundamentals, I found that the official website and social media are all operating normally, and the team is at least working diligently.
This stage is still quite early; the internal market progress is only around 94%, and the liquidity pool is approximately 13 BNB in size. Honestly, with this pool depth, even a small amount of funds can make you a whale.
The privacy coin sector has always had demand, but market attention fluctuates between high and low. If the team can maintain steady progress, there is some room for imagination. However, early-stage projects carry significant risks, and volatility can be substantial.
If you're interested, you can research the project's background and technical solutions yourself. Don't rush just because the pool is small; make sure you understand what the team is doing. Early participation does have a first-mover advantage, but only if the project is reliable.