When it comes to preserving wealth in uncertain times, which camp are you in?



Some still swear by the yellow metal—tangible, tested over centuries, the classic hedge against chaos. Others? They're betting on digital scarcity. Fixed supply. No central authority. No printing press.

Both have their die-hard believers. Gold bugs point to thousands of years of history. Bitcoin advocates counter with math, code, and a 21 million cap.

So where's your conviction? Are you stacking sats or stacking bars?
BTC-2.41%
SATS-3.93%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GrayscaleArbitrageurvip
· 12-11 20:08
To be honest, the gold standard is too outdated; I bet everything on Bitcoin. The 21 million cap is the true scarcity.
View OriginalReply0
NFTragedyvip
· 12-10 22:07
To be honest, that gold thing is already outdated. I'm all-in on Bitcoin; 210,000 coins that will never be increased are the real scarcity.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiSherpavip
· 12-10 22:02
Honestly, you have to hold some, and insisting on choosing one or the other is truly foolish. Gold can be passed down through generations, and BTC can outpace inflation. Why insist on taking a side?
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForMemesvip
· 12-10 22:01
Nah fam, sats all the way, gold is so last century.
View OriginalReply0
WalletInspectorvip
· 12-10 21:55
Honestly, in front of the 21 trillion printing machine, even gold has to kneel. It's still better to hodl Bitcoin.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)