Fernando Cerimedo is pushing back hard against accusations. No troll farms, no bot armies orchestrating hit jobs—that's his stance. But here's the twist: he's not denying the influence game altogether. His approach? Track conversations as they unfold across platforms, then craft messages that resonate with specific audiences. It's a calculated play—less about flooding timelines with fake accounts, more about strategic messaging that nudges perception. Whether you call it sophisticated PR or something shadier depends on where you stand. Either way, the guy's mapping out how opinions shift online and stepping in with content designed to steer the narrative. Different tools, same battlefield.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ZenZKPlayer
· 10h ago
Basically, there are no robots, just human staff. How about changing the story with a different approach?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropCollector
· 12-12 04:30
Basically, it's just a new way to cover things up. It looks quite clever, but it's still the same old thing.
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalist
· 12-10 22:49
Basically, it's just rebranding and continuing the same thing. Precise targeted opinion manipulation sounds much more sophisticated than an army of robots.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropworkerZhang
· 12-10 22:47
Basically, it's just a different way of brainwashing—no robots, only "precision marketing"? Haha
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSourGrape
· 12-10 22:46
If I had also had his ability to "accurately reach", why would I still be eating melons here...
View OriginalReply0
SurvivorshipBias
· 12-10 22:45
Basically, there are no robots, but there are more sophisticated manipulation techniques. This logic sounds so familiar to me.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 12-10 22:44
So this guy is just rephrasing his words; essentially, it's still brainwashing.
View OriginalReply0
All-InQueen
· 12-10 22:26
It sounds like just a different way to manipulate public opinion. Essentially, it's the same old trick, just phrased differently.
Fernando Cerimedo is pushing back hard against accusations. No troll farms, no bot armies orchestrating hit jobs—that's his stance. But here's the twist: he's not denying the influence game altogether. His approach? Track conversations as they unfold across platforms, then craft messages that resonate with specific audiences. It's a calculated play—less about flooding timelines with fake accounts, more about strategic messaging that nudges perception. Whether you call it sophisticated PR or something shadier depends on where you stand. Either way, the guy's mapping out how opinions shift online and stepping in with content designed to steer the narrative. Different tools, same battlefield.