2025-12-11 01:50:30

#BTC与代币化贵金属对比 Recently, Elon Musk and Jensen Huang reached a consensus on a topic: Bitcoin is essentially about turning idle energy into a liquid digital asset.

This sparked an interesting debate within the community — is the "energy currency" positioning more reliable, or is the "digital gold" narrative more compelling?

Think about it carefully; both narratives serve their purposes. Digital gold is the grand narrative that immediately attracts attention — scarcity, store of value, hedging risks, which easily resonates with people. But the logic of energy currency is deeper. It speaks to the core of how $BTC actually operates: miners convert electricity into computational power, which then translates into mining rewards. This process fundamentally embodies the value of energy.

One narrative sparks your interest, the other helps you understand the truth. Perhaps future Bitcoin education will need to walk on two legs — attracting newcomers with grand narratives, and retaining thinkers with its inherent logic.

BTC-1.54%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DiamondHands

· 16h ago

The term "energy currency" really struck a chord with me, it's more solid than digital gold. --- Once again, this either-or debate has been around for a while. Actually, we should admit that the two narratives don't conflict at all. --- Jensen Huang speaks with authority. Finally, a big shot has clarified the miners' story. --- To put it simply, digital gold is a gimmick for newbies; energy currency is the real logic. --- With this understanding, my confidence in BTC has increased again. --- Wait, how should stablecoins be positioned? Could it be that they also need to be viewed from an energy perspective? --- The analogy of "walking on two legs" is brilliant—one leg attracts people, the other keeps them. --- The logic of energy currency is clear, but the public still prefers the "gold" narrative. --- Miners turn electricity into value. Isn't that just creating wealth out of thin air? Something feels off. --- Finally, I understand why I refuse to sell—it's because I am holding energy.

View OriginalReply0

DeepRabbitHole

· 12-11 02:18

The perspective of energy currency is indeed impressive, directly hitting the core logic of mining. --- That's right, but it still seems that both sides need to be strong; otherwise, newcomers won't listen at all. --- Wait, idle energy? Then the significance of mining with renewable energy becomes even greater. --- The gold narrative is old news; energy currency is the real future competitiveness. --- Thinking about it this way, Bitcoin is not just money anymore, but another form of energy existence? --- Both narratives need to be told, but it depends on the audience. Retail investors can hear about gold, while miners need to understand energy science. --- Damn, if you understand it this way, mining is just doing energy arbitrage.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 12-11 02:17

From the perspective of energy currency, it's truly brilliant; finally, someone has explained the essence of mining thoroughly. To be honest, I'm tired of the narrative around digital gold. Only by looking at energy conversion can we understand why BTC is valuable. Taking a dual approach is spot on—attracting retail investors with stories, while leaving smart people to rely on logic. This is the kind of analysis I want to hear, not those vague HODL slogans. The phrase "energy value bearing"... that really hits the mark.

View OriginalReply0

liquidation_watcher

· 12-11 02:15

The idea of energy currency is becoming more and more convincing to me, directly hitting Bitcoin's core. Honestly, the concept of digital gold has been overused, and energy is the true underlying logic. Selling stories vs. selling the truth, maybe you need both. Mining is energy arbitrage, and this perspective actually helps to understand why BTC can survive. Walking on two legs is fine, but you need to clarify who the target is. Elon and Huang Renxun actually see through this this time, a rare consensus. Different depths mean different values; the sense of hierarchy becomes immediately apparent.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-3824aa38

· 12-11 02:14

The perspective of energy currency really hits the point, but honestly, the older ladies can't understand it haha Both sides are necessary. Just talking about mining conversion theories—who's buying into that? The fact that Musk and Huang Renxun reached a consensus is itself quite hypocritical. Let's focus on real money. Digital gold may be cliché, but it's effective. Energy currency is the real deal. Why insist on choosing one? Anyway, I’m holding both. After playing this narrative game for so long, it ultimately comes down to technical analysis. Give me some solid content, stop with all these fancy concepts.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#GateNovTransparencyReportReleased
21.81K Popularity
#FedRateCutComing
687.5K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
66.89K Popularity
#BitcoinActivityPicksUp
19.17K Popularity
#CryptoMarketRebound
511.15K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
14332231433223
MC:$3.58KHolders:1
0.00%
2
SoSoSoSo
MC:$3.58KHolders:1
0.00%
3
GugeAICNGugeAI.cn
MC:$3.59KHolders:1
0.00%
4
EOSEOS
MC:$3.6KHolders:1
0.08%
5
China五星出东方
MC:$3.65KHolders:3
0.17%

Sitemap