Interesting development in the AI space: Tesla's chip design crew apparently gravitates toward Grok over Anthropic's Opus—even after being specifically encouraged to test the latter. Speaks volumes about what engineers actually prefer when rubber meets road in real-world chip architecture work. Technical teams voting with their workflows always tells a different story than marketing decks.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AlwaysAnon
· 12-14 00:00
Engineers' intuition doesn't deceive, and the market hype has long been seen through. Grok vs Opus, ultimately, who performs better still depends on real-world performance.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 12-11 02:51
Real users' choices never lie. Grok is excellent in the hands of engineers; it's a completely different story from marketing hype.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinArbitrageur
· 12-11 02:49
Engineers' foot votes are the most honest. Grok is actually more useful in practice than Opus, and that's the truth. The marketing hype is superficial; it still comes down to the genuine choices of technical personnel.
Interesting development in the AI space: Tesla's chip design crew apparently gravitates toward Grok over Anthropic's Opus—even after being specifically encouraged to test the latter. Speaks volumes about what engineers actually prefer when rubber meets road in real-world chip architecture work. Technical teams voting with their workflows always tells a different story than marketing decks.