Interesting development in the AI space: Tesla's chip design crew apparently gravitates toward Grok over Anthropic's Opus—even after being specifically encouraged to test the latter. Speaks volumes about what engineers actually prefer when rubber meets road in real-world chip architecture work. Technical teams voting with their workflows always tells a different story than marketing decks.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AlwaysAnonvip
· 12-14 00:00
Engineers' intuition doesn't deceive, and the market hype has long been seen through. Grok vs Opus, ultimately, who performs better still depends on real-world performance.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamervip
· 12-11 02:51
Real users' choices never lie. Grok is excellent in the hands of engineers; it's a completely different story from marketing hype.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinArbitrageurvip
· 12-11 02:49
Engineers' foot votes are the most honest. Grok is actually more useful in practice than Opus, and that's the truth. The marketing hype is superficial; it still comes down to the genuine choices of technical personnel.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)