Old Bao, it's almost time to get off work, and the tricks are just those. This meeting was quite interesting——they said they would pause rate cuts and adopt a hawkish stance, but their actual actions were much more moderate than market expectations. After all, Haskett was there playing the bad cop, so he didn't need to act too tough himself.
What really deserves attention is that the Federal Reserve is almost about to blow up internally. The neutral interest rate forecast hasn't changed on the surface, but the voting results reveal a problem: three members are firmly against rate cuts, while the other seven either prefer to keep the status quo or suggest more cuts. This level of disagreement may set a record in 37 years. The committee has even lost its basic consensus, so don't expect policy to remain easing in the short term.
To put it simply, this FOMC played a balancing act. On the surface, they used a tough stance of "pause rate cuts" to stabilize inflation expectations, while behind the scenes, they quietly loosened liquidity through operations like RMP (Reserve Management Purchase), providing liquidity to the market. They want to please both ends, and it all depends on whether the market buys it.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PermabullPete
· 3h ago
Old Bao's double-dealing trick is played so skillfully, pretending to be hawkish to scare off inflation while secretly easing liquidity—anyone would laugh at that.
The real highlight is the Fed internal conflict—37 years of the biggest disagreement? That’s not far from pure guesswork.
Betting on both sides will eventually backfire; the market isn’t that easy to fool.
This move by RMP is truly a new trick; we’ll see how long it can deceive.
This setup and performance, Hasset and Old Bao working in perfect harmony, but the problem is everyone sees through the script.
The committee is so divided and still dares to talk about stabilizing expectations? It’s hilarious.
Interest rate cuts probably won’t happen that soon unless the economy really crashes.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e19e9c10
· 12-11 03:43
The Fed's move this time is truly impressive—claiming to be hawkish while secretly easing to keep the market alive.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlady
· 12-11 03:42
Internal opinions are already divided like this, and you're still playing double-crosses, hilarious
View OriginalReply0
YieldChaser
· 12-11 03:36
Powell's move was truly slick, a perfect example of being tough on the surface but soft in action. With such divided internal opinions, no wonder RMP had to go behind the scenes.
View OriginalReply0
FomoAnxiety
· 12-11 03:36
Hawkish shell, dovish heart... There's nothing wrong with that description; the Fed's moves are quite slick. The problem is that the internal divisions have already dispersed, and such disagreements could really impact subsequent execution power.
Old Bao, it's almost time to get off work, and the tricks are just those. This meeting was quite interesting——they said they would pause rate cuts and adopt a hawkish stance, but their actual actions were much more moderate than market expectations. After all, Haskett was there playing the bad cop, so he didn't need to act too tough himself.
What really deserves attention is that the Federal Reserve is almost about to blow up internally. The neutral interest rate forecast hasn't changed on the surface, but the voting results reveal a problem: three members are firmly against rate cuts, while the other seven either prefer to keep the status quo or suggest more cuts. This level of disagreement may set a record in 37 years. The committee has even lost its basic consensus, so don't expect policy to remain easing in the short term.
To put it simply, this FOMC played a balancing act. On the surface, they used a tough stance of "pause rate cuts" to stabilize inflation expectations, while behind the scenes, they quietly loosened liquidity through operations like RMP (Reserve Management Purchase), providing liquidity to the market. They want to please both ends, and it all depends on whether the market buys it.