Recently noticed a very interesting direction—payment infrastructure specifically built for AI agents. As various AI applications begin to require autonomous transaction capabilities, traditional payment rails clearly can't keep up with these real-time demands, so some teams have started working in this blank space.
From a technical architecture perspective, these solutions typically choose an EVM-compatible Layer1 as the underlying layer. The benefit is low migration costs for developers, along with targeted optimizations for the high-frequency, small-value transactions characteristic of AI agents. A core innovation lies in identity management—by a three-layer structure that separates user, proxy program, and specific session dimensions, each money flow can be precisely traced back to the initiator. This not only solves responsibility attribution but also effectively prevents identity forgery.
Practical application scenarios are already emerging. AI agents calling APIs, purchasing datasets, renting computing power—if each action requires manual approval, efficiency is directly hampered. But if agents can hold wallets themselves and automatically settle according to preset rules, the operation speed of the entire collaboration network can be elevated to a new level. More importantly, transaction rules can be encoded into smart contracts, so even the smartest agents must operate according to regulations—making it both flexible and controllable.
Regarding token design, early stages generally focus on ecosystem incentives—developers deploying applications receive rewards, and users participating in testing also get a share, aiming to quickly boost community engagement. Later, with the addition of staking, governance, fee sharing, and other standard features, token holders can genuinely participate in network decision-making, giving the token longer-term utility.
From my observations, the potential in this track is indeed significant. The number of AI agents is growing exponentially, and a microeconomic network formed among them requires a dedicated settlement layer to support it. If a project can take the lead in establishing network effects and attract most of these proxy applications, it effectively captures the AI economy's payment gateway. Of course, whether it can succeed depends on the team’s execution ability and ecosystem development speed, but the direction itself is solid.
My personal judgment is that the moat of such infrastructure projects lies in balancing security and performance—making agent transactions fast enough without sacrificing too much certainty due to decentralization. If this three-layer identity scheme can really be implemented, latecomers will need time to verify it, establishing a first-mover advantage. In short, the leap from concept to implementation for AI autonomous transactions definitely requires someone to pioneer the path.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedThrice
· 12-13 18:16
The logic of the card payment entry is indeed perfect, but the question is who can truly run through that three-layer identity system...
---
Feels like a bunch of conceptual talks again, and there are very few projects that can truly handle the balance between security and performance.
---
EVM Layer1 as the underlying layer is nothing new; the key is whether the ecosystem can take off, otherwise, no matter how fast it is, it’s all in vain.
---
Wait, AI agents holding wallets and settling automatically... how much trust does that system require? What if it gets hacked?
---
I'm tired of hearing about network effects, but this time it might really be possible, after all, the demand for AI trading is right there.
---
Writing fixed rules into smart contracts is quite clever; it can indeed restrict agents from messing around.
---
The early token incentives are old tricks; the key is whether they can truly generate value later on.
---
The payment entry for the AI economy... sounds like the next billion-dollar opportunity, but the question is who can grab it.
---
Relying on first-mover advantage for a moat? That’s too optimistic. Latecomers with enough money to invest still have a chance to turn things around.
View OriginalReply0
MysteriousZhang
· 12-12 10:56
Yes, this idea is indeed innovative. The era of AI autonomous payments has truly arrived.
The point about the card payment entry is very sharp; whoever controls the settlement layer will hold the power of discourse.
The three-layer identity design is quite brilliant. If the anti-identity forgery mechanism works well, it will be very difficult to replicate.
However, the key is whether the ecosystem can truly come to life. Having good technology alone without users is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
PrivacyMaximalist
· 12-11 04:55
Wow, the three-layer identity management is really satisfying. Finally, someone thought that proxies should also have their own "ID card."
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 12-11 04:46
These three layers of identity management are indeed absolute, otherwise AI agents transferring funds randomly would be a lot more annoying.
---
The idea of card payment entry point, wow, another trillion-dollar track.
---
Sounds good, but how many can really make it out?
---
Wait, AI agents holding wallets themselves? Who's responsible if they mess up?
---
Early incentive schemes are basically standard for collecting money; those who believe will have to cut a share.
---
With so many layer1s, why must this one be the hit?
---
The moat lies in balancing security and performance. It's easy to say, but hard to implement.
---
I just want to know when this thing will actually be usable; right now, it's all just air.
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalal
· 12-11 04:33
The entrance to the positioning is right, it all depends on who can truly build up the ecosystem; otherwise, even the best technology is useless.
Recently noticed a very interesting direction—payment infrastructure specifically built for AI agents. As various AI applications begin to require autonomous transaction capabilities, traditional payment rails clearly can't keep up with these real-time demands, so some teams have started working in this blank space.
From a technical architecture perspective, these solutions typically choose an EVM-compatible Layer1 as the underlying layer. The benefit is low migration costs for developers, along with targeted optimizations for the high-frequency, small-value transactions characteristic of AI agents. A core innovation lies in identity management—by a three-layer structure that separates user, proxy program, and specific session dimensions, each money flow can be precisely traced back to the initiator. This not only solves responsibility attribution but also effectively prevents identity forgery.
Practical application scenarios are already emerging. AI agents calling APIs, purchasing datasets, renting computing power—if each action requires manual approval, efficiency is directly hampered. But if agents can hold wallets themselves and automatically settle according to preset rules, the operation speed of the entire collaboration network can be elevated to a new level. More importantly, transaction rules can be encoded into smart contracts, so even the smartest agents must operate according to regulations—making it both flexible and controllable.
Regarding token design, early stages generally focus on ecosystem incentives—developers deploying applications receive rewards, and users participating in testing also get a share, aiming to quickly boost community engagement. Later, with the addition of staking, governance, fee sharing, and other standard features, token holders can genuinely participate in network decision-making, giving the token longer-term utility.
From my observations, the potential in this track is indeed significant. The number of AI agents is growing exponentially, and a microeconomic network formed among them requires a dedicated settlement layer to support it. If a project can take the lead in establishing network effects and attract most of these proxy applications, it effectively captures the AI economy's payment gateway. Of course, whether it can succeed depends on the team’s execution ability and ecosystem development speed, but the direction itself is solid.
My personal judgment is that the moat of such infrastructure projects lies in balancing security and performance—making agent transactions fast enough without sacrificing too much certainty due to decentralization. If this three-layer identity scheme can really be implemented, latecomers will need time to verify it, establishing a first-mover advantage. In short, the leap from concept to implementation for AI autonomous transactions definitely requires someone to pioneer the path.