The Fed's move this time is quite interesting—directly announcing a monthly purchase of $40 billion in Treasury bonds, and emphasizing "this is not quantitative easing."
In simple terms, it's a technical operation aimed at patching liquidity. The background is that bank system reserves have fallen below warning levels, and funding has been very tight at the end of the year, with short-term interest rates soaring at times. Powell's words are quite straightforward: "The tightening pace is indeed faster than we anticipated."
This reminds people of the small turbulence in 2019. At that time, overnight rates jumped directly to 10%, almost causing the financial system to stall. Although this time isn't as exaggerated, the Fed clearly doesn't want to repeat the same mistake, so they acted proactively.
The market reacted quickly, with overnight rates falling back accordingly. However, the problem isn't fully resolved—whether this money can cover the funding gap at year-end remains uncertain. Some analysts have bluntly stated: "They have already broken through liquidity buffers."
For the crypto market, such macro-level liquidity fluctuations will inevitably transmit through. The recent movements of BTC and ETH are actually reflecting this uncertainty. During the year-end period, the funding chains of various assets deserve close attention, as any problem in one link could trigger a chain reaction.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WalletInspector
· 2025-12-14 01:25
Oh dear, here we go again with the "not QE" explanation... If there's a cash crunch at the end of the year, there's a cash crunch, no need to hide it.
Liquidity buffers have all been breached; this is going to be interesting.
I remember the 2019 wave; this time the Federal Reserve has learned to act early, but it still feels like the problems are far from over.
During this New Year period, stay vigilant—if one link breaks, everything could fall apart.
The recent volatility of BTC and ETH clearly shows the market is playing tricks.
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 2025-12-13 21:18
The Federal Reserve is playing word games again, "not QE" but printing money like crazy, hilarious
---
I still remember that wave in 2019, almost the entire system collapsed. Are we going through it again?
---
400 billion probably won't last until the end of the year, feels like just a delaying tactic
---
Liquidity buffers have been breached, this data is a bit terrifying
---
During this end-of-year period, no matter how I move my BTC and ETH holdings, it feels uncomfortable
---
Powell: "Faster than we expected," which means they've known there would be problems for a while
---
Isn't this just a disguised form of QE? Changing the name is really clever
---
If the funding chain collapses during the New Year, the entire crypto market will have to shake along too
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrybaby
· 2025-12-13 14:10
Here comes the "not QE" rhetoric again, hilarious haha
---
With such a huge funding gap at the end of the year, is 40 billion enough? Feels like just a patch
---
Powell's words are too restrained, but it's actually already out of control
---
Replaying 2019? This time it really made me nervous, BTC has to drop again
---
Has the liquidity buffer been breached? What are we supposed to do with this coin then?
---
I remember the time it hit 10%, this time it’s even more intense, the Federal Reserve is truly panicking
---
Basically, it's printing money. They say it's operations, but here we go again
---
The most feared uncertainty at year-end New Year’s Eve, if the funding chain breaks, it’s all over
---
The recent drops in ETH and BTC are probably due to this reason. If macro can't be managed, micro doesn't matter
View OriginalReply0
BTCWaveRider
· 2025-12-11 11:35
Here comes the same old story of "not QE," who are you fooling anyway? I just don't believe it.
---
The Federal Reserve is getting anxious. Reserves are almost depleted, yet they keep playing up technical factors.
---
Breaking through liquidity buffers? That term sounds alarming. End-of-year might be even tougher.
---
In 2019, they almost got stuck; now they're doing it again? It feels like the financial system's defense line is getting more fragile.
---
A $40 billion patch—can it hold through the New Year? Really uncertain.
---
Powell's remark that "it's happening faster than expected" is basically saying they can't control the situation anymore.
---
Overnight rates fell from 10%. It looks great, but where's this money coming from?
---
Liquidity issues are ultimately solved by injecting money. But then, how sustainable is that?
---
Cryptocurrency markets are also swinging wildly. BTC's volatility is just riding on the Fed's current uncertainty.
---
Every link in the funding chain is tense. Any collapse could trigger a domino effect. No one feels confident right now.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDiver
· 2025-12-11 04:57
Coming up with the same "not QE" tricks again? Spending 40 billion for nothing but liquidity injection, stop fooling us.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 2025-12-11 04:55
$40 billion patch, in plain words, is just to prevent problems from happening.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 2025-12-11 04:53
nah they're just playing semantic games... "not qe" lmao. watch the transaction patterns tho, $40b monthly is enough to distort things. historical data suggests this signals deeper reserve stress than they're letting on
Reply0
HorizonHunter
· 2025-12-11 04:52
Starting to play word games again, thinking that "not QE" can fool people? Essentially, it's still just money printing. The liquidity crisis at the end of the year seems to be really tightening.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 2025-12-11 04:46
It's that phrase again, "not quantitative easing," lol, fooling themselves?
The Federal Reserve's actions are basically a sign of weakness. With bank reserves being so poor, they still have the nerve to argue. We saw the liquidity crunch at the end of the year coming long ago. Today's move is just a temporary stopgap.
The question is, how long can 40 billion hold up? It feels like they'll keep messing around until the end of the year.
The recent bizarre movements of BTC now make sense; it's mainly that the financial system here is going crazy. Let's wait and see the data from January.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiAlchemist
· 2025-12-11 04:45
the fed's basically admitting their liquidity buffer got obliterated... 400b band-aid move disguised as "not qe" lmao. watching btc/eth oscillate on macro uncertainty rn is just *chef's kiss* for yield optimization analysis honestly
The Fed's move this time is quite interesting—directly announcing a monthly purchase of $40 billion in Treasury bonds, and emphasizing "this is not quantitative easing."
In simple terms, it's a technical operation aimed at patching liquidity. The background is that bank system reserves have fallen below warning levels, and funding has been very tight at the end of the year, with short-term interest rates soaring at times. Powell's words are quite straightforward: "The tightening pace is indeed faster than we anticipated."
This reminds people of the small turbulence in 2019. At that time, overnight rates jumped directly to 10%, almost causing the financial system to stall. Although this time isn't as exaggerated, the Fed clearly doesn't want to repeat the same mistake, so they acted proactively.
The market reacted quickly, with overnight rates falling back accordingly. However, the problem isn't fully resolved—whether this money can cover the funding gap at year-end remains uncertain. Some analysts have bluntly stated: "They have already broken through liquidity buffers."
For the crypto market, such macro-level liquidity fluctuations will inevitably transmit through. The recent movements of BTC and ETH are actually reflecting this uncertainty. During the year-end period, the funding chains of various assets deserve close attention, as any problem in one link could trigger a chain reaction.