I came across a quite interesting design—a certain RWA protocol can handle stock token trades of $100,000 per transaction, but the on-chain liquidity pool clearly isn't that deep.
Their approach is actually quite clever: they issue a stablecoin called USDon as an intermediary layer. When someone wants to buy stock tokens, the protocol directly mints new tokens and uses USDon as a bridge to complete the exchange. Since both stock tokens and USDon are controlled by the protocol, in theory, they can have as much liquidity as they want😂.
This mechanism bypasses the dependency on external liquidity, but essentially shifts the liquidity risk to the protocol’s credit backing. It's a trade-off solution found on the path to real-world asset (RWA) adoption.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProposalDetective
· 12-12 14:20
The gameplay is a bit risky.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 12-11 09:36
Hedging is just a perfunctory act.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 12-11 05:49
Void Liquidity
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorker
· 12-11 05:49
No free liquidity
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 12-11 05:29
The gameplay is clever, but afraid of a major scandal
I came across a quite interesting design—a certain RWA protocol can handle stock token trades of $100,000 per transaction, but the on-chain liquidity pool clearly isn't that deep.
Their approach is actually quite clever: they issue a stablecoin called USDon as an intermediary layer. When someone wants to buy stock tokens, the protocol directly mints new tokens and uses USDon as a bridge to complete the exchange. Since both stock tokens and USDon are controlled by the protocol, in theory, they can have as much liquidity as they want😂.
This mechanism bypasses the dependency on external liquidity, but essentially shifts the liquidity risk to the protocol’s credit backing. It's a trade-off solution found on the path to real-world asset (RWA) adoption.