#数字资产生态回暖 $BTC Wake up, stop dreaming about the Federal Reserve buying bonds and copying the surge.
Speaking of the story in 2019, the Federal Reserve indeed stopped quantitative tightening and switched to buying short-term government bonds. At that time? The market indeed exploded — US stocks soared north, and Bitcoin also rebounded fiercely. It looked great, but you have to know, that was just the last hurrah before the crisis. Then the black swan of the pandemic struck, global markets wailed, and real "nuclear-level" quantitative easing was forced out. The problem is, that happened after the market had already collapsed.
History has its rhyme, but it won't be copy-pasted. This time? No one dares to guarantee that the same crisis-level flooding will happen again. The market is indeed calling for liquidity, but the Fed might just turn on the tap symbolically, far from opening fire hydrants on that scale.
The reality is so harsh: copying old scripts often backfires. This time’s storyline might be completely different.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FrogInTheWell
· 11h ago
Well said, the wave in 2019 did make many people a lot of money, but do they still want to replicate it now? Dream on, the Federal Reserve has no such intention this time.
No, that's not right. The liquidity gap is so large this time, why not just print money directly?
History has always been a spiral upward; don’t think about full replication, but the pattern shouldn't completely reverse either.
Waiting to see the Federal Reserve’s next move, it's too early to say anything now.
It's quite funny, a bunch of people are still waiting for the 2019 script to replay. Wake up, everyone.
This time is indeed different; without the "forced" reason like the pandemic, the Federal Reserve is even colder.
Interesting, the market is calling for a water shortage but the tap can't turn that fast, just stuck like this.
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTop
· 12-13 14:54
Well said. That wave in 2019 was indeed the last madness. How many people are just waiting for history to repeat itself?
History never copies and pastes, I have to engrain this in my mind.
Are you fantasizing about another big liquidity injection? Wake up, everyone. This time the Federal Reserve isn't that generous.
Federal Reserve: I'm just symbolically opening the faucet, don't overthink it.
The dream of bouncing back through national debt should be awakened; the gameplay is completely different now.
This is truly not a 2019 remake. We need to think about how to write a new story.
View OriginalReply0
wagmi_eventually
· 12-12 07:59
Stop thinking about it, history will not repeat itself, only rhyme.
Basically, it's just copying the 2019 approach which is no longer effective. This time, the Federal Reserve is unlikely to engage in such aggressive easing.
For those still waiting for "nuclear-level" quantitative easing, please wake up.
2019 was the last frenzy before the crisis; the pandemic was the real trigger. Now, the conditions aren't there anymore.
Liquidity shortage is real, but the Federal Reserve will only loosen a little, definitely not a flood like a fire hydrant.
Copying the script? This time, you'll suffer big losses. The storyline is likely to be completely different.
Not all history can be replicated, some pitfalls can only be stepped into once.
This is reality, and it hits hard.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoWageSlave
· 12-11 07:48
That's right, the 2019 wave was really just a false alarm. Those still dreaming the same dream should really wake up now.
Still thinking about flooding the market to rescue it? Wake up, this time the Federal Reserve might just do some easing and that's it.
History is just rhythmic, copying and pasting this set really should be outdated; following the old script leads to the biggest losses.
This time there's no nuclear-level stimulus, only a trickle. Don't hold onto any fantasies, everyone.
When the black swan crashes down, quantitative easing will truly arrive. But as for now, who knows?
View OriginalReply0
TopEscapeArtist
· 12-11 07:47
Is this the same old trick from 2019 again? I'm really fed up with being trapped, always saying this time is different, but it turns out to be the same. The Fed's liquidity can't fill this gap at all. Honestly, relying on government bonds to turn things around is less effective than just betting on a black swan.
View OriginalReply0
HashRatePhilosopher
· 12-11 07:47
I saw through the 2019 wave; why would it be possible to replicate it this time? The Federal Reserve has learned to be smart.
---
Those who copied 2019 this time are fortunate.
---
The core issue is one—this time there is no black swan to cushion the blow, and there’s no reason to flood the market with liquidity.
---
Wake up everyone, history never repeats exactly, it only rhymes. If you’re still waiting anxiously for a big liquidity injection now, you’re probably going to be disappointed.
---
In simple terms, the Federal Reserve used to passively inject liquidity; now, they simply don’t want to actively give out money.
---
Does the market really lack liquidity when it calls for it? Wake up, everyone, it’s just a narrative they’ve created.
---
This article hit the mark; I refuse to believe there are still fools waiting for a second 2019.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdrop
· 12-11 07:34
Well said. The 2019 wave was indeed illusory, and we're still waiting for the Federal Reserve's savior... It's time to wake up.
Wait, is this really just turning on a little faucet this time? Feels like they're tricking us into taking the bait again.
The phrase "history has a rhyme" is brilliant, but retail investors like us are always repeating the same mistake...
Bitcoin really needs to learn to stop relying on the central bank and stand on its own.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxOpener
· 12-11 07:22
Don't always think about relying on the Federal Reserve for a bailout; this time, the show from 2019 definitely won't be replayed.
---
You're dreaming again; brother, history won't stand still.
---
Exactly right, if they stick to the old tricks this time, I’ll just vomit.
---
The core issue is liquidity; this time it might really be dire, the fire hydrant can't be turned on.
---
I just want to know if the Federal Reserve will really flood the market this time—bet or not?
---
Wake up, everyone; the story line has definitely changed.
---
No one enjoyed the 2019 wave, but it's too naive to expect a repeat now.
---
Talking about the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing as if you have some special powers.
#数字资产生态回暖 $BTC Wake up, stop dreaming about the Federal Reserve buying bonds and copying the surge.
Speaking of the story in 2019, the Federal Reserve indeed stopped quantitative tightening and switched to buying short-term government bonds. At that time? The market indeed exploded — US stocks soared north, and Bitcoin also rebounded fiercely. It looked great, but you have to know, that was just the last hurrah before the crisis. Then the black swan of the pandemic struck, global markets wailed, and real "nuclear-level" quantitative easing was forced out. The problem is, that happened after the market had already collapsed.
History has its rhyme, but it won't be copy-pasted. This time? No one dares to guarantee that the same crisis-level flooding will happen again. The market is indeed calling for liquidity, but the Fed might just turn on the tap symbolically, far from opening fire hydrants on that scale.
The reality is so harsh: copying old scripts often backfires. This time’s storyline might be completely different.