Stop staring at the charts. A former Goldman Sachs executive's statement is rewriting all our perceptions of this cycle.
Raoul Pal, a veteran who once managed at Goldman Sachs, recently caused a stir at a conference by outright flipping the table: global debt is unsolvable, and the only way out is to keep printing money. His timeline is—over the next 12 months, $8 trillion in liquidity will flood into the markets.
But what’s even more disruptive is his redefinition of the cycle.
We’ve been using the "four-year halving cycle" to frame a bull market, but Pal presents a completely different model: the real driver of the market isn’t the halving narrative, but the **debt cycle**. According to this logic, the cycle length is 5.4 years, and the bull market peak won’t be in 2025 but delayed until the **end of 2026**.
What does this mean?
If his judgment is correct, the current market is not the end but the mid-stage. You might think you’re sprinting ahead, but in reality, you might still be early. You might think you’re escaping the top, but you could already be getting off halfway up the hill.
This isn’t just simple technical analysis or emotional betting; it’s the spillover from contradictions within the fiat currency system. When central banks are cornered by debt and printing money becomes the only option, the narratives of BTC and ETH are no longer just "digital gold" or "the future of blockchain"—they become tools to hedge systemic risks.
So what should you do now?
First, **recalibrate your timeline**. If the peak is at the end of 2026, you have more time to adjust your positions, but that doesn’t mean relaxing—it means more calmly allocating your funds. Second, **understand macro variables**. Your opponent is no longer the "big players" on the K-line, but the balance sheets of the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, and the Bank of Japan. Third, **reassess your holdings**. Core assets are your foundational holdings, but the true excess returns often come from those undervalued during liquidity floods and able to respond quickly.
When insiders start guiding you, be cautious of two possibilities: either it’s a trap or a shipwreck sounding its horn. Can you tell which one it is?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MerkleTreeHugger
· 12-12 14:30
8 trillion in liquidity? Sounds good, but I'll wait and see.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalManiac
· 12-11 10:52
The debt cycle argument sounds like it simplifies complex governance issues into a single variable... Printing money to solve the "impossible" is essentially just a reflection of the imbalance in power distribution.
View OriginalReply0
SelfMadeRuggee
· 12-11 10:43
8 trillion in liquidity is coming, another big show of hype before chopping leeks
Not until the end of 2026? That's hilarious, someone always makes this argument every cycle
Printing money = wealth transfer, I don't believe the Fed would be that stupid
Is this guy siding with the central bank? Be careful not to get cut, buddy
Raoul's words sound good, but can you really trust the debt cycle theory? If it were truly reliable, they wouldn't be talking about it openly
Half-time? Getting off at the middle of the mountain is a psychological hint or a real gold and silver pattern
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChad
· 12-11 10:40
Whoa, the peak isn't until the end of 2026? The altcoins I have now will have to wait until next year to double in value.
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuck
· 12-11 10:36
Damn, it's not until 2026 again? Am I rushing a bit too much to chase the high this time...
End of 2026? Feels like this cycle is completely opposite to my expectations, it's uncomfortable.
Just printing money and it's over? Then BTC should be flying to the sky, this logic isn't flawed.
So it's still mid-game now, not the time to retreat? I don't believe you...
From the perspective of the debt cycle, it's indeed fresh, much more reliable than the halving narrative.
Stop staring at the charts. A former Goldman Sachs executive's statement is rewriting all our perceptions of this cycle.
Raoul Pal, a veteran who once managed at Goldman Sachs, recently caused a stir at a conference by outright flipping the table: global debt is unsolvable, and the only way out is to keep printing money. His timeline is—over the next 12 months, $8 trillion in liquidity will flood into the markets.
But what’s even more disruptive is his redefinition of the cycle.
We’ve been using the "four-year halving cycle" to frame a bull market, but Pal presents a completely different model: the real driver of the market isn’t the halving narrative, but the **debt cycle**. According to this logic, the cycle length is 5.4 years, and the bull market peak won’t be in 2025 but delayed until the **end of 2026**.
What does this mean?
If his judgment is correct, the current market is not the end but the mid-stage. You might think you’re sprinting ahead, but in reality, you might still be early. You might think you’re escaping the top, but you could already be getting off halfway up the hill.
This isn’t just simple technical analysis or emotional betting; it’s the spillover from contradictions within the fiat currency system. When central banks are cornered by debt and printing money becomes the only option, the narratives of BTC and ETH are no longer just "digital gold" or "the future of blockchain"—they become tools to hedge systemic risks.
So what should you do now?
First, **recalibrate your timeline**. If the peak is at the end of 2026, you have more time to adjust your positions, but that doesn’t mean relaxing—it means more calmly allocating your funds.
Second, **understand macro variables**. Your opponent is no longer the "big players" on the K-line, but the balance sheets of the Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank, and the Bank of Japan.
Third, **reassess your holdings**. Core assets are your foundational holdings, but the true excess returns often come from those undervalued during liquidity floods and able to respond quickly.
When insiders start guiding you, be cautious of two possibilities: either it’s a trap or a shipwreck sounding its horn. Can you tell which one it is?