7 New Wallets Just Loaded Up With 100M XRP Each. Here's the Major Actor

@media only screen and (min-width: 0px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=“wrapper-sevio-6a57f7be-8f6e-4deb-ae2c-5477f86653a5”]{width:320px;height:100px;} } @media only screen and (min-width: 728px) and (min-height: 0px) { div[id^=“wrapper-sevio-6a57f7be-8f6e-4deb-ae2c-5477f86653a5”]{width:728px;height:90px;} }

The XRP Ledger recorded a dramatic surge in whale activity that immediately caught market attention. Massive movements across the network occurred within minutes, sparking fresh speculation about institutional liquidity flows and upcoming ecosystem activity.

The scale and timing of the transfers suggest deliberate coordination rather than routine on-chain movement.

Xaif drew early attention to the activity through a widely circulated X post. His post highlighted that seven wallets each sent 100 million XRP. Four of the sender wallets are linked to Ripple accounts, while the remaining three remain unidentified. This blend of known and unknown actors has intensified scrutiny from analysts and liquidity watchers.

On-Chain Confirmation of the Transfers

Trusted blockchain explorers show clear evidence of the back-to-back transfers. Each transaction involved exactly 100 million XRP. All movements occurred within a short window, which implies a structured plan. Such timing is uncommon for retail participants and therefore points toward institutional operations or coordinated treasury activity.

The XRPL has seen large transfers before, but seven synchronized movements stand out. The size and repetition increase the importance of understanding the wallets involved. Analysts often track transactions of this size to gauge liquidity demand and market preparation.

The Ripple-Linked Wallets

Four wallets involved in the activity connect to known Ripple addresses. These addresses have appeared in previous treasury operations and liquidity adjustments. Ripple has historically managed significant XRP movements for institutional on-demand liquidity, settlement support, or internal restructuring.

Transfers of this size rarely indicate direct selling. Ripple often moves XRP for operational distribution, partner support, or custody restructuring. The presence of four Ripple-linked addresses suggests planned internal allocation rather than market dumping.

The Three Unknown Wallets

The remaining three wallets present the strongest source of speculation. These addresses do not match known institutional or exchange clusters. They also do not correspond to previous large-scale retail or OTC actors.

Their involvement raises questions about potential new institutions entering the XRP ecosystem. Several analysts suggest the wallets may belong to custodial partners, liquidity providers, or newly onboarded financial entities. Their exact association remains unconfirmed, but their synchronized timing suggests coordination with the Ripple-linked transfers.

Market Impact and Liquidity Signals

Whale movements often influence market sentiment even without immediate price action. Large transfers can signal increased liquidity demand, preparation for institutional settlement, or adjustments in market-making reserves.

The XRP market currently relies heavily on deep liquidity to support growing institutional corridors. These transfers may help strengthen that liquidity. Traders are watching exchange inflows closely because any shift from cold storage to exchanges can change short-term momentum.

What Happens Next

Analysts will monitor the seven wallets for further activity. Exchange deposits from any of them would create new signals. Additional clustering could also help identify the unknown addresses. Until then, the event remains a major liquidity story rather than a confirmed market-moving trigger.

The network has clearly awakened. These coordinated 100-million-XRP transfers show that significant actors are preparing for something larger. The coming days will reveal whether this marks strategic accumulation, institutional onboarding, or broader liquidity expansion.

Disclaimer*: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.*