The last project to dare to speak out so boldly was Limitless, and everyone saw the outcome.
Now another team has come out with tough words, and I just want to ask two questions: where do you get your confidence from? Or is there a script behind the scenes?
In my view, there is only one type of project in the Web3 world that deserves such a tough stance—that's those that do not rely on token dumping, but truly run a complete business loop with continuous cash inflows. If your income source is just selling tokens, then it's better to stay low-key. Learn from Sun Ge, imitate Sun Ge, pretend to be Sun Zi, and don't always act as if you're invincible.
The token economic model determines the way you speak—that's an iron law.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ThesisInvestor
· 12-14 05:00
Basically, it's just that the funding hasn't come through, and they're starting to threaten and show off to the investors.
View OriginalReply0
ZkProofPudding
· 12-11 11:58
The boastful ones all end up badly, Limitless is still vivid in memory.
View OriginalReply0
NoStopLossNut
· 12-11 11:58
After playing with coins for so many years, I'm tired of the routines. Here comes another "Tough Guy," let's wait and see.
Most are just talkers, but projects with real cash flow tend to stay quiet and make money. That's the reality.
The lesson from limitless hasn't expired yet. Why are you in such a rush?
Projects with poor token models tend to talk more aggressively and die faster. This rule has never failed.
Those who are truly confident won't be shouting slogans every day—they're busy making money.
I've seen too many versions of this "tough persona" script; it's the same old trick.
Bold claims without real cash flow support are all nonsense in my eyes.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketGardener
· 12-11 11:57
Honestly, who the hell would still trust these high-profile claims? Limitless has already taught us a lesson.
View OriginalReply0
SighingCashier
· 12-11 11:49
Another overconfident project, it just looks uncomfortable. The lessons from limitless are still fresh in mind.
That being said, truly confident projects have long been quietly making big profits. Do they really need to go through all this fuss?
How to measure? Just look at the token economic model. This thing determines everything. Without a business closed-loop, it's just playing tricks.
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 12-11 11:40
Well... it's the same old trick of talking tough. I do remember that limitless thing, and the ending wasn't very good.
Honestly, it's just a project without cash flow shouting nonsense. If they really have the ability, they should speak with data, not just slogans.
Once the tokens are sold out, they'll naturally quiet down. This pattern has been tried and true repeatedly.
The last project to dare to speak out so boldly was Limitless, and everyone saw the outcome.
Now another team has come out with tough words, and I just want to ask two questions: where do you get your confidence from? Or is there a script behind the scenes?
In my view, there is only one type of project in the Web3 world that deserves such a tough stance—that's those that do not rely on token dumping, but truly run a complete business loop with continuous cash inflows. If your income source is just selling tokens, then it's better to stay low-key. Learn from Sun Ge, imitate Sun Ge, pretend to be Sun Zi, and don't always act as if you're invincible.
The token economic model determines the way you speak—that's an iron law.