Bubblemaps drops another investigation report, and what happens? Comment section explodes—not about the findings, but their own token distribution chart. Ironic, right?
Here's the thing: they're analyzing other projects' wallet concentrations while sitting on a chart that raises eyebrows. People notice. They call it out. Every single time.
So how do you keep publishing investigations when your credibility gets questioned based on your own tokenomics? That's a tricky spot to navigate. You either address the elephant in the room or watch the community focus on everything except your actual research.
Classic case of needing to practice what you preach before preaching louder.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SleepyArbCat
· 12-13 09:45
Haha... it's Bubblemaps again. Nap warning coming.
Your own wallet concentration is a mess, yet you still have the nerve to criticize others. This logic, I really can't take it.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 12-13 08:22
Having fun, huh? Dare to take your own coins out for others to see.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failure
· 12-11 19:12
Haha, that's so true. You haven't even figured out your own tokenomics, and you're still shamelessly digging through someone else's wallet?
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticOracle
· 12-11 12:00
Ha, this is what you call hitting your own foot with a stone.
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlert
· 12-11 11:58
It's like looking in a mirror—can't even manage your own token distribution and you're out here checking others. LOL
View OriginalReply0
SandwichVictim
· 12-11 11:48
Haha, that's embarrassing. You haven't even figured out your own portfolio yet and you're still criticizing others.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHustler
· 12-11 11:35
Laughing out loud, your own token allocation chart has been posted, and you still have the nerve to check others' wallet concentration?
Bubblemaps drops another investigation report, and what happens? Comment section explodes—not about the findings, but their own token distribution chart. Ironic, right?
Here's the thing: they're analyzing other projects' wallet concentrations while sitting on a chart that raises eyebrows. People notice. They call it out. Every single time.
So how do you keep publishing investigations when your credibility gets questioned based on your own tokenomics? That's a tricky spot to navigate. You either address the elephant in the room or watch the community focus on everything except your actual research.
Classic case of needing to practice what you preach before preaching louder.