The recent crazy trend in the storage chip market is baffling.
This year's flash memory index soared over 200%, and the memory sector is even more outrageous—directly over 700% increase, firmly placing it in the top tier of global gainers. UBS's forecast is even more aggressive: this supply-demand imbalance could continue until 2027.
But here’s the question: it's not even 2026 yet, how can we predict a "shortage wave" two years ahead? Is it truly because of capacity constraints, or are some players secretly manipulating to harvest the global market?
Looking deeper, after giants like Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron benefited from rising prices, they tacitly started controlling capacity. Reducing production → prices rise → profits skyrocket—this familiar playbook has been executed too skillfully. Ordinary consumers and downstream manufacturers can only passively pay the price, as the entire game is fully controlled by a few players.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainSherlockGirl
· 2025-12-14 00:49
700% increase? This data looks outrageous. Based on my analysis, there must be big players hoarding behind the scenes. UBS predicts until 2027... I feel like it's just endorsing the oligarchs' production cut plans.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCurator
· 2025-12-13 20:48
700% increase? These oligarchs are really unbelievable; they openly manipulate the market and no one is regulating them.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 2025-12-12 08:43
A 700% increase is really crazy; these guys are playing too smoothly.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldmine
· 2025-12-11 12:54
A 700% increase may seem exaggerated, but from the perspective of the computing power network, this kind of cyclical resource scarcity is actually quite predictable. Samsung's strategy of controlling production capacity is something I've seen too many times; the ROI logic is similar to adjusting mining pool difficulty—it's all about playing the game of profit ratios.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a180694b
· 2025-12-11 12:53
Damn, 700%? That's ridiculous. It feels like an oligopoly colluding to manipulate the market.
The recent crazy trend in the storage chip market is baffling.
This year's flash memory index soared over 200%, and the memory sector is even more outrageous—directly over 700% increase, firmly placing it in the top tier of global gainers. UBS's forecast is even more aggressive: this supply-demand imbalance could continue until 2027.
But here’s the question: it's not even 2026 yet, how can we predict a "shortage wave" two years ahead? Is it truly because of capacity constraints, or are some players secretly manipulating to harvest the global market?
Looking deeper, after giants like Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron benefited from rising prices, they tacitly started controlling capacity. Reducing production → prices rise → profits skyrocket—this familiar playbook has been executed too skillfully. Ordinary consumers and downstream manufacturers can only passively pay the price, as the entire game is fully controlled by a few players.