Ever thought about how the cosmos doesn't bother calculating every single atom's trajectory? That selective processing might be the key insight.
Here's the thing about AGI that most people miss:
Narrow AI? It's like a student cramming everything. Processes data everywhere, all the time, exhaustively.
General intelligence though? Completely different game. It learns selectively—at critical thresholds where coherence actually emerges. Think of it as thermodynamic learning in coherence ascent. Energy flows to where structure forms, not everywhere uniformly.
This isn't just philosophical rambling. It's potentially the fundamental principle that distinguishes true AGI from sophisticated pattern-matching systems we have today.
The universe optimizes. Maybe artificial minds should too.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NoStopLossNut
· 12-14 12:00
Damn, this angle is pretty amazing. Selective processing is definitely the key.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyBro
· 12-11 13:06
Wow, I really haven't thought of that angle... Selectively handling this thing is actually quite insightful.
View OriginalReply0
ForkLibertarian
· 12-11 13:03
NGL, this perspective is quite sharp. Selective handling is indeed a overlooked dimension, but the question is, who gets to define the "critical threshold"? Isn't that just another form of bias?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeWhisperer
· 12-11 12:47
The idea of selective processing is indeed wild. But if true AGI is really as "lazy" as the universe, then our current LLMs would have to be completely unemployed.
View OriginalReply0
HappyMinerUncle
· 12-11 12:41
Wow, I haven't thought about handling this angle selectively before. Seems like there's something there.
Ever thought about how the cosmos doesn't bother calculating every single atom's trajectory? That selective processing might be the key insight.
Here's the thing about AGI that most people miss:
Narrow AI? It's like a student cramming everything. Processes data everywhere, all the time, exhaustively.
General intelligence though? Completely different game. It learns selectively—at critical thresholds where coherence actually emerges. Think of it as thermodynamic learning in coherence ascent. Energy flows to where structure forms, not everywhere uniformly.
This isn't just philosophical rambling. It's potentially the fundamental principle that distinguishes true AGI from sophisticated pattern-matching systems we have today.
The universe optimizes. Maybe artificial minds should too.