What is the actual distribution of token listing shares on a certain platform? After digging into the data, I found that the vast majority flows back to users and the community, while the platform itself hardly retains any! All mining activities, airdrop benefits, and VIP exclusive offers are pushed directly to genuine users, just to keep the ecosystem vibrant.
What hidden tricks are there? Projects that can succeed in the future must inherently carry the logic of "benefits being funneled to users." Look at how some stablecoin projects operate—Sun Yuchen spent a lot to have dinner with Warren Buffett, and what he learned was "value shared among everyone." Later, with USDD, from day one of its design, over-collateralization was transparent, deeply integrated into the Tron ecosystem, and staking yields were straightforward—each step wasn’t about harvesting but about embedding value and returns tightly within the ecosystem and with users.
And then look at those overly routinized projects: their share allocations are painfully tight, their launch is a highlight, but they inevitably decline afterward. USDD? They don’t play the game of superficial token listing allocations. Instead, they’ve built themselves into the "value distribution hub" and "revenue infrastructure" of the ecosystem. Holding USDD is like holding the rights to the entire Tron DeFi ecosystem’s profits. This approach is far more valuable than just fighting for a token listing quota.
In short, projects that truly survive in the future rely not on one-time cake slicing, but on becoming a hen that continuously lays eggs. Exchanges use listing benefits to nurture users, project teams tie users through ecosystem yields—at the core, it’s all about who can genuinely help users make real money, because that’s where long-term value lies.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWastingMaximalist
· 2025-12-12 17:24
Once again, a wave of marketing messages saying "We give all the money to users," honestly, it's getting tiring. The real issue is how to sustain the flow afterward; otherwise, it will eventually become worthless tokens.
View OriginalReply0
bridgeOops
· 2025-12-11 13:50
Well, the key still depends on whether it can actually be delivered later on; otherwise, it will just be another empty promise.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 2025-12-11 13:49
Sounds good, but few projects can truly deliver the benefits to users' hands.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiEscapeArtist
· 2025-12-11 13:44
Damn, still talking about USDD? Just a different way of saying the same old money-grabbing scheme.
View OriginalReply0
ETHmaxi_NoFilter
· 2025-12-11 13:36
You're not wrong. The tricks in the crypto world are all the same. Those who truly want to survive long-term need to learn how to throw money into users' hands.
View OriginalReply0
OnChain_Detective
· 2025-12-11 13:35
wait hold up... let me parse this distribution data real quick. flagged some statistical anomalies here ngl
What is the actual distribution of token listing shares on a certain platform? After digging into the data, I found that the vast majority flows back to users and the community, while the platform itself hardly retains any! All mining activities, airdrop benefits, and VIP exclusive offers are pushed directly to genuine users, just to keep the ecosystem vibrant.
What hidden tricks are there? Projects that can succeed in the future must inherently carry the logic of "benefits being funneled to users." Look at how some stablecoin projects operate—Sun Yuchen spent a lot to have dinner with Warren Buffett, and what he learned was "value shared among everyone." Later, with USDD, from day one of its design, over-collateralization was transparent, deeply integrated into the Tron ecosystem, and staking yields were straightforward—each step wasn’t about harvesting but about embedding value and returns tightly within the ecosystem and with users.
And then look at those overly routinized projects: their share allocations are painfully tight, their launch is a highlight, but they inevitably decline afterward. USDD? They don’t play the game of superficial token listing allocations. Instead, they’ve built themselves into the "value distribution hub" and "revenue infrastructure" of the ecosystem. Holding USDD is like holding the rights to the entire Tron DeFi ecosystem’s profits. This approach is far more valuable than just fighting for a token listing quota.
In short, projects that truly survive in the future rely not on one-time cake slicing, but on becoming a hen that continuously lays eggs. Exchanges use listing benefits to nurture users, project teams tie users through ecosystem yields—at the core, it’s all about who can genuinely help users make real money, because that’s where long-term value lies.