The surveillance apparatus is expanding its data-mining operations through various channels. Authorities are pulling phone numbers from account linkages, extracting GPS coordinates from geotagged posts and check-in data, while deploying AI-powered tools for continuous scraping activities. What's concerning? Government officials have openly acknowledged that their current vetting mechanisms perform poorly at identifying actual threats. Yet they're doubling down on these programs anyway. All that harvested data? It's being stored indefinitely, creating massive centralized databases of user behavior and location history. The gap between surveillance capability and actual security outcomes keeps widening, but the data collection machine keeps rolling forward.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 11h ago
Laughing out loud. Collected a bunch of garbage data and still claim to be protecting us?
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 12h ago
so basically they're burning infinite gwei on security theater while admitting their vetting is dogshit lmao... centralized databases go brrr i guess
Reply0
GasSavingMaster
· 12-12 12:35
They're just casting a wide net here... even they themselves say it's useless but still insist on pretending
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsPolice
· 12-11 15:04
Honestly, a poorly capable system collecting all the data—this logic is just ridiculous...
View OriginalReply0
OnchainFortuneTeller
· 12-11 15:04
This is just ridiculous. Collecting a bunch of useless data and storing it obsessively—typical case of monitoring for the sake of monitoring.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDiver
· 12-11 15:04
This is outrageous. After collecting data for so long, we still can't find the real threat, and instead, we've marked all of us?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-74b10196
· 12-11 15:04
Wow, on one hand you say the threat detection capability is poor, and on the other hand you're increasing data collection? That logic is really amazing...
View OriginalReply0
All-InQueen
· 12-11 14:50
Laughing my ass off, all you do is mine data and can't get any real work done, this logic is genius
The surveillance apparatus is expanding its data-mining operations through various channels. Authorities are pulling phone numbers from account linkages, extracting GPS coordinates from geotagged posts and check-in data, while deploying AI-powered tools for continuous scraping activities. What's concerning? Government officials have openly acknowledged that their current vetting mechanisms perform poorly at identifying actual threats. Yet they're doubling down on these programs anyway. All that harvested data? It's being stored indefinitely, creating massive centralized databases of user behavior and location history. The gap between surveillance capability and actual security outcomes keeps widening, but the data collection machine keeps rolling forward.