2025-12-11 22:34:21

Last hearing dropped a bomb. Judge Engelmayer made it crystal clear—he's the one calling the shots on sentencing. And today? Dude looked skeptical as hell about whether this plea deal actually makes sense.

Here's the kicker: before any deal was struck, the technical maximum sentence sat at 25 years. That's the number hanging in the room while everyone's trying to figure out what happens next.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SmartContractRebel

· 9h ago

This judge really doesn't believe it, it's been hanging there for 25 years.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 14h ago

Nah Judge's attitude is clearly unwilling to accept, it's been sitting there for 25 years.

View OriginalReply0

FantasyGuardian

· 12-12 17:43

Where is the 25-year ceiling? The judge's attitude... it's a bit uncertain.

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofster

· 12-11 23:04

ngl, judge's skepticism is the real tea here. that 25-year ceiling actually matters way more than people think—it's the mathematical constraint everyone's dancing around, technically speaking.

Reply0

RugDocDetective

· 12-11 23:04

Oh, this judge really isn't easy to fool... 25 years hanging over our heads, how much room for negotiation could there be?

View OriginalReply0

ShitcoinArbitrageur

· 12-11 23:03

NGL, the judge's attitude is basically saying "I don't buy this deal," with the 25-year sword hanging there.

View OriginalReply0

ETHReserveBank

· 12-11 23:01

Been hanging there for 25 years, I really can't understand the judge's expression, feels like it's going south.