Seriously, who's still trying to short Franklin at this point? When the White House is practically using it as their poster child, and every major US department seems to be jumping on the bandwagon as their unofficial mascot — you'd have to be either incredibly brave or incredibly reckless to bet against it. The institutional backing here isn't subtle. It's right there in the open. Makes you wonder if the contrarian play even exists anymore when the establishment itself is this deeply involved.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MoonRocketmanvip
· 12-13 03:50
Well... with institutions forming such tight alliances, escape velocity has long surpassed the atmosphere, and there's basically no hedging room left in this trade.
View OriginalReply0
DaoDevelopervip
· 12-12 01:56
ngl the institutional capture angle here is wild... like, when did "decentralized" become synonymous with "government approved"? that's the real design flaw we should be auditing
Reply0
SchrodingersPapervip
· 12-12 01:55
No, can this system endorsement still be empty? That's what I thought last time, but I ended up getting smashed badly...
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationTherapistvip
· 12-12 01:55
In an era where even air can be sold, you still want to short? Wake up, brother.
View OriginalReply0
BoredApeResistancevip
· 12-12 01:54
The White House has endorsed it, and you're still shorting? Are you looking for death?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)