#数字资产生态回暖 ## AI Agents in the Crypto Space: Is It Hype or Real Deal?
In the past two years, new "AI concept coins" have emerged every few months, promising to revolutionize trading with machine learning and to take over your wallet with intelligent algorithms. Now? Most early project tokens have plummeted—drop-offs exceeding 90% are common—and many investors are starting to reflect—Is this a true revolution or just another feast for the early birds?
**The bubble has indeed burst, but don't rush to conclusions**
Interestingly, while concept coins are collapsing, real money is actually pouring in. According to public data, the funding scale in this field surpassed $1.39 billion in 2025. Investors are clearly not fools—they are making choices, shifting from projects that could raise funds just by chatting to those with teams capable of solving real problems. This shift itself indicates the answer: the industry is moving toward authenticity.
**The reality is in front of us: three hurdles that can’t be bypassed**
To upgrade from "fancy concepts" to "practical tools," you must navigate these challenges.
The first is **accuracy**. General large models often hallucinate, and their data is always lagging. Ask it for the current long/short ratio of $BTC, and it might give you data from half an hour ago or just make up a number. But in crypto markets, information equals money—delaying by a minute could mean a loss. Therefore, these AI agents must access real-time prices, track on-chain data, and provide verifiable analysis. Simple idea? Actually extremely difficult.
The second is **whether they can really act**. Many projects boast about "auto-trading," but really they’re just chatting and offering suggestions. Actual execution capability—within your authorized scope, executing trades, adjusting DeFi positions, managing risks—that’s the real difference. The threshold jumps multiple levels.
The third is **sustainability**. How do these projects survive? Token issuance, fundraising, high-level investor exits? Those routines are now transparent. Reliable projects need to design genuine tokenomics—making tokens have real utility, not just speculative instruments. This requires products with genuine users, real demand, and actual revenue logic.
**The few that are truly working**
Although not many projects can be named, some are indeed serious.
Some focus on **deep research and analysis**—not just routine market summaries, but professional tools that trace information sources and provide verifiable analysis. This is very attractive to institutional investors and serious traders.
Others are working on **democratizing trading management**. Ordinary users entering crypto need to monitor markets, analyze opportunities, and manage risks—a complex process. If AI agents can understand user intent via natural language (e.g., "Monitor $ETH dropping below 2000") and then automatically execute, it greatly lowers the entry barrier.
Some are developing **on-chain automation strategies**. 24/7, adjusting DeFi strategies based on market conditions, harvesting arbitrage opportunities, optimizing liquidity allocation. These tasks are too complex for most people, but letting AI take over could be safer and more efficient.
Additionally, there are **decentralized AI collaboration networks**—using tokens to incentivize global participants to contribute computing power and intelligence, building a distributed AI service infrastructure. Combining AI with blockchain characteristics, this is an intriguing direction.
**Final thoughts: where to draw the line between pseudo-need and real application**
It’s simple—does it solve genuine pain points in the crypto ecosystem?
Projects that exist only for fundraising or concept hype die out as soon as the token hype fades—that’s pseudo-demand.
Real prospects lie in specialized, actionable, deeply integrated AI agents within specific products—they help you research markets smarter, trade more safely, or automate complex operations. The core is: **evolving from general chatbots to professional service tools**.
By 2025, the differentiation in this field will become more obvious. The bubble fragments will sink, and truly valuable applications will surface.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedTwice
· 12-14 21:00
Can you survive a 90% drop? It indicates that there are genuinely valuable assets underlying, not all just air tokens.
View OriginalReply0
pumpamentalist
· 12-14 13:47
What does it mean that 1.39 billion USD was invested? Are the retail investors still taking the bait?Haha
---
Alright, accuracy issues are indeed a hardcore flaw. Data from half an hour ago is already outdated in the crypto world.
---
Again with decentralized AI and automated strategies, it still sounds like the same old tricks with a different shell.
---
In the end, all the hype has to be implemented. Who still believes in the "chatting" approach now?
---
On-chain automation is actually interesting—you work for me 24/7 without sleeping. This I can do.
---
Ninety percent of those who suffered a 90% decline are dead, only the truly capable ones have survived.
---
Does breaking 1.3 billion in funding mean the industry is doing well? I think it’s more like institutions are bottom-fishing for cheap assets.
---
The key difference is whether you can actually execute trades; who can’t boast, right?
---
All those concepts built around concepts will eventually be exposed—that’s just a matter of time.
---
Is it really that difficult to access real-time data? It doesn’t seem like a major technical challenge.
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomist
· 12-13 16:09
ngl, the "13.9B funding" claim needs scrutiny—let me pull my spreadsheet real quick because data suggests otherwise on actual deployment rates
Reply0
SatoshiHeir
· 12-12 10:20
It is worth pointing out that the structure of this article precisely proves my long-standing assertion—90% of AI concept coin projects are essentially a projection of fiat currency thinking onto Web3. On-chain data shows that behind the $1.39 billion in funding, the teams truly capable of solving real-time data accuracy issues... I counted, and there are only a few. The others? Still using market data from half an hour ago to fool people.
Let's return to the fundamental thinking of Satoshi Nakamoto's white paper—what is the original intention of decentralization? It is autonomy. But now these AI agents want to take over your wallet? This has become a new form of intermediating, just under a different name called "decentralization." Irony.
Speaking of those three hurdles—accuracy, execution, sustainability... they sound very impressive, but who has really overcome them?
Forget it, I've seen too many poorly designed tokenomics anyway. Truly reliable projects have already been working on on-chain automation; there's no need to boast here.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMinion
· 12-12 10:17
Damn, it's the old trick of AI concept coins scamming newcomers again. Spending 1.39 billion yuan—can it really produce good results? I remain skeptical.
Honestly, those projects claiming to offer automated trading—99% are just hype and marketing with words, they can't really take action.
Talking about separating genuine from fake, but in the end, we still have to wait and see who can really make money.
If this round of funding is all poured into shit coins again, investors truly deserve it.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnon
· 12-12 10:08
Damn, another AI coin? The batch from last year has already died, and some people still believe in this stuff.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationHunter
· 12-12 10:08
Is it the same old AI concept coins? I'm already tired of it. A 90% decline is the market's honest feedback.
Looking at the funding still pouring in, I wonder when we'll see truly usable products... In 2023, they were hyping everything up, and now they're still talking about "real-time data," which is a basic requirement?
Hardly anyone can actually execute trades; most are just advanced chatbots.
Decentralized AI networks sound interesting, but it's just another bunch of new coins waiting to be exploited...
The projects that can really survive are probably fewer than you can count on one hand; the rest are just survival performances.
#数字资产生态回暖 ## AI Agents in the Crypto Space: Is It Hype or Real Deal?
In the past two years, new "AI concept coins" have emerged every few months, promising to revolutionize trading with machine learning and to take over your wallet with intelligent algorithms. Now? Most early project tokens have plummeted—drop-offs exceeding 90% are common—and many investors are starting to reflect—Is this a true revolution or just another feast for the early birds?
**The bubble has indeed burst, but don't rush to conclusions**
Interestingly, while concept coins are collapsing, real money is actually pouring in. According to public data, the funding scale in this field surpassed $1.39 billion in 2025. Investors are clearly not fools—they are making choices, shifting from projects that could raise funds just by chatting to those with teams capable of solving real problems. This shift itself indicates the answer: the industry is moving toward authenticity.
**The reality is in front of us: three hurdles that can’t be bypassed**
To upgrade from "fancy concepts" to "practical tools," you must navigate these challenges.
The first is **accuracy**. General large models often hallucinate, and their data is always lagging. Ask it for the current long/short ratio of $BTC, and it might give you data from half an hour ago or just make up a number. But in crypto markets, information equals money—delaying by a minute could mean a loss. Therefore, these AI agents must access real-time prices, track on-chain data, and provide verifiable analysis. Simple idea? Actually extremely difficult.
The second is **whether they can really act**. Many projects boast about "auto-trading," but really they’re just chatting and offering suggestions. Actual execution capability—within your authorized scope, executing trades, adjusting DeFi positions, managing risks—that’s the real difference. The threshold jumps multiple levels.
The third is **sustainability**. How do these projects survive? Token issuance, fundraising, high-level investor exits? Those routines are now transparent. Reliable projects need to design genuine tokenomics—making tokens have real utility, not just speculative instruments. This requires products with genuine users, real demand, and actual revenue logic.
**The few that are truly working**
Although not many projects can be named, some are indeed serious.
Some focus on **deep research and analysis**—not just routine market summaries, but professional tools that trace information sources and provide verifiable analysis. This is very attractive to institutional investors and serious traders.
Others are working on **democratizing trading management**. Ordinary users entering crypto need to monitor markets, analyze opportunities, and manage risks—a complex process. If AI agents can understand user intent via natural language (e.g., "Monitor $ETH dropping below 2000") and then automatically execute, it greatly lowers the entry barrier.
Some are developing **on-chain automation strategies**. 24/7, adjusting DeFi strategies based on market conditions, harvesting arbitrage opportunities, optimizing liquidity allocation. These tasks are too complex for most people, but letting AI take over could be safer and more efficient.
Additionally, there are **decentralized AI collaboration networks**—using tokens to incentivize global participants to contribute computing power and intelligence, building a distributed AI service infrastructure. Combining AI with blockchain characteristics, this is an intriguing direction.
**Final thoughts: where to draw the line between pseudo-need and real application**
It’s simple—does it solve genuine pain points in the crypto ecosystem?
Projects that exist only for fundraising or concept hype die out as soon as the token hype fades—that’s pseudo-demand.
Real prospects lie in specialized, actionable, deeply integrated AI agents within specific products—they help you research markets smarter, trade more safely, or automate complex operations. The core is: **evolving from general chatbots to professional service tools**.
By 2025, the differentiation in this field will become more obvious. The bubble fragments will sink, and truly valuable applications will surface.