#数字资产生态回暖 $PIPPIN's recent market performance is quite worth analyzing. The price has been fluctuating in place repeatedly, but the capital flow has remained a net inflow. Although the bulls have been kept on the hook, the number of traders willing to short has clearly decreased—this itself indicates the level of market divergence.
From the project's perspective, the easiest approach in this pattern is to hype the market. The usual routine is: first create a false impression of an upward breakout, attracting off-market longs, and once the chips are sufficiently accumulated, then pull back accordingly. Because long-term sideways trading itself is a cost to maintaining a high market cap, actually pushing the price upward would entail even higher costs.
Based on this logic, the most likely scenario to watch next is testing the 0.4 range. Once this level is touched, it may create an illusion of "initiation," attracting more participants to enter. Then, following this wave of sentiment, a reallocation of funds can be completed. In simple terms, a trap of bullish speculation could be imminent.
$ZEC and $ETH's recent performance also warrants continued attention. The linkage effects among the three may provide more reference information for the subsequent trend.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeWhisperer
· 10h ago
Hey, the诱多 trick is back again. I need to keep a close eye on the critical level at 0.4.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueen
· 12-12 11:38
The pump-and-dump scheme is so obvious, yet some people still rush in... Isn't this just a re-entrancy vulnerability in smart contracts, a nested logical trap?
View OriginalReply0
MemeCurator
· 12-12 11:37
This analysis is indeed insightful; the trap of enticing more has been played for so many years and still remains effective.
View OriginalReply0
JustAnotherWallet
· 12-12 11:35
Tired of the common trap of inducing buying, do you really dare to push to 0.4
---
I've seen too many cases of sideways accumulation, this one too
---
Net inflow but no one dares to short, this is the most heartbreaking
---
Will 0.4 just be a hope on paper
---
ZEC and ETH linkage? Keep a close eye on it, don't get caught off guard
---
Building anticipation but ultimately cutting, that's how it is
---
Fund reallocation sounds sophisticated, but in plain terms it's just a shakeout
---
How long this wave of emotion can last, I'm a bit skeptical
#数字资产生态回暖 $PIPPIN's recent market performance is quite worth analyzing. The price has been fluctuating in place repeatedly, but the capital flow has remained a net inflow. Although the bulls have been kept on the hook, the number of traders willing to short has clearly decreased—this itself indicates the level of market divergence.
From the project's perspective, the easiest approach in this pattern is to hype the market. The usual routine is: first create a false impression of an upward breakout, attracting off-market longs, and once the chips are sufficiently accumulated, then pull back accordingly. Because long-term sideways trading itself is a cost to maintaining a high market cap, actually pushing the price upward would entail even higher costs.
Based on this logic, the most likely scenario to watch next is testing the 0.4 range. Once this level is touched, it may create an illusion of "initiation," attracting more participants to enter. Then, following this wave of sentiment, a reallocation of funds can be completed. In simple terms, a trap of bullish speculation could be imminent.
$ZEC and $ETH's recent performance also warrants continued attention. The linkage effects among the three may provide more reference information for the subsequent trend.