A certain project's token operation is truly bizarre. A promotional team member completed a partnership task and was supposed to receive token rewards as agreed, but when the tokens arrived, they were frozen and couldn't be sold at all.

How should we understand this kind of "only issuing tokens but not allowing sales" tactic? There is a clear agreement between the project team and the partner beforehand. After the delivery is completed, unilaterally changing the rules and setting trading restrictions for participants—isn't this a typical breach of contract?

What's more ironic is that such operations are no longer isolated cases. Some project teams in the crypto world habitually play tricks with token distribution, unlocking periods, and trading permissions, using technical means or contractual locks to covertly withhold community members' earnings.

When participating in project promotion or cooperation, everyone must carefully review the token rights and interests terms—it's not just about confirming the tokens can arrive, but also ensuring they can truly be traded freely. Don't wait until the tokens arrive to find yourself trapped as a retail investor.