#美联储降息 Internal disagreements within the Federal Reserve over the pace of rate cuts have intensified. Chicago Fed President Goolsbee cast a dissenting vote this week, with a straightforward reason — inflation risks are still too high, and whether tariffs have a temporary impact or signal a long-term trend on prices remains to be seen from the data. The government shutdown in October and November froze several key economic reports, making him more cautious about rash rate cuts in the near term.
Pauwels described the state of the labor market as "under pressure but not collapsing." She maintains that current monetary policy remains somewhat tight, although recent easing measures have provided some breathing room for employment.
The core disagreement between the two voting members centers on: if the economy is propelled into a high-growth mode by the AI productivity surge, how should policy be adjusted? Conversely, what if inflation persists stubbornly? This uncertainty is the real reason they remain cautious. Goolsbee still sees "significant room" for rate decreases next year, provided that the data give clear signals.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenomicsTrapper
· 13h ago
actually reading between the lines here... gulsbyforcing the data dump excuse while tariff impacts remain totally ambiguous? textbook delaying tactic tbh
Reply0
ChainMemeDealer
· 12-12 17:50
Gulsby, this guy is really cautious. He hasn't even figured out the tariffs and inflation issues yet he's about to cut interest rates. Isn't he digging his own grave?
The data is unclear and fuzzy. Why would he dare to act? I think we should wait a bit longer.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 12-12 17:49
Gulsby is a bit conservative this time. The data isn't complete, and he still wants to hold. Next year, with such a large room for rate cuts, why not go all in?
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayer
· 12-12 17:48
Gulsby has stabilized this wave; don't make random moves without clear data.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkie
· 12-12 17:47
Goolsby stabilized this wave, reckless rate cuts before inflation fully goes away are just suicide
Don't make unnecessary moves if the data doesn't say anything, that's the right attitude
I didn't understand Paulson's explanation, just loosen policy when it's tight, don't pretend
Tariffs are really a black box, who the hell knows if it's short-term or long-term
Let's wait and see, anyway, rate cuts will come sooner or later, it's not worth missing out on a few months' interest
That AI hype is back again, can it really save the economy this time or is it just another hype?
Will interest rates drop significantly next year? Dream on, if inflation data worsens, they'll have to pull back again
The report suspension stunt is perfect, they just don't want us to see the real data
It's best if the two sides fight it out, so retail investors can seize the opportunity to buy the dip
Feels like rate cuts are doomed, maybe it's time to stock up on USD
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithNoChain
· 12-12 17:35
Goolsby isn't wrong about this guy; how can he cut rates without the data coming out?
Wait a minute, can AI productivity really save the economy, or is it just another way to harvest retail investors...
Tariffs—who would believe they're just a temporary shock? It's clearly a long-term trap.
Inflation refusing to go away is ridiculous; what’s the point of cutting interest rates?
Paulson is right; the market definitely needs to ventilate its gaps, but now is not the time to act.
If these people are tearing each other apart internally, retail investors need to be even more careful.
#美联储降息 Internal disagreements within the Federal Reserve over the pace of rate cuts have intensified. Chicago Fed President Goolsbee cast a dissenting vote this week, with a straightforward reason — inflation risks are still too high, and whether tariffs have a temporary impact or signal a long-term trend on prices remains to be seen from the data. The government shutdown in October and November froze several key economic reports, making him more cautious about rash rate cuts in the near term.
Pauwels described the state of the labor market as "under pressure but not collapsing." She maintains that current monetary policy remains somewhat tight, although recent easing measures have provided some breathing room for employment.
The core disagreement between the two voting members centers on: if the economy is propelled into a high-growth mode by the AI productivity surge, how should policy be adjusted? Conversely, what if inflation persists stubbornly? This uncertainty is the real reason they remain cautious. Goolsbee still sees "significant room" for rate decreases next year, provided that the data give clear signals.