[Block Rhythm] Moody’s, one of the world’s top credit rating agencies, has recently made a major move—designing a tailored rating framework specifically for stablecoins. This scheme directly addresses a real issue: seemingly identical stablecoins may have vastly different rating results due to differences in their reserve assets.
Their approach is quite clear. The first step is to decompose each stablecoin’s reserve asset pool, evaluate what assets are inside one by one, and then assess the quality based on the credit ratings of these assets themselves. In other words, even if you claim to be 1:1 pegged to the US dollar, if your reserves are mixed with a bunch of junk bonds or high-risk assets, your rating will naturally decline.
The second step is even more interesting—they will also monitor market value changes. For the same type of asset, risk varies depending on the type and duration, so Moody’s will assign a haircut rate to each asset class. The purpose of this is to prevent situations where the paper figures look good but the actual risks are hidden.
Additionally, Moody’s plans to incorporate operational risk, liquidity risk, and technological risk into the assessment, resulting in an overall final rating. This means that even if your reserves look sufficient, if there are operational management flaws or hidden technical vulnerabilities, your rating will also be downgraded.
Currently, Moody’s is soliciting market comments, with a deadline of January 26, 2026. Once this framework is officially implemented, it will bring more transparent risk assessment standards to the stablecoin market and set higher requirements for project teams.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeAssassin
· 12-13 04:54
2026? How long do I have to wait? Stablecoins have already gone through several generations.
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalker
· 12-13 04:54
Moody's move this time is quite interesting, essentially creating a "score system" for stablecoins, which seems like it will change the game rules.
---
Waiting until 2026 again? Seems pretty impatient... By the way, can it really create a gap?
---
Regarding the quality of reserve assets, it feels like USDC and USDT will be examined very thoroughly.
---
Basically, it's still fear of stablecoin incidents, and regulators are tightening the screws.
---
I'm just worried that by then, the rating framework might be more unstable than the stablecoins themselves...
---
Transparency is a good thing, but could this thing become a new center of power?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007
· 12-13 04:51
Implementation is only in 2026? So slow, by then the ecosystem will have changed again.
View OriginalReply0
DaoDeveloper
· 12-13 04:49
ngl moody's finally catching up to what auditors have been doing for years—examining reserve composition and liquidity dynamics. but here's the thing: if they're just rating collateral quality, they're missing the governance primitives that actually make or break a stablecoin's resilience.
Moody's Releases New Framework for Stablecoin Credit Ratings; Same 1:1 Peg to the US Dollar but May Receive Different Ratings
[Block Rhythm] Moody’s, one of the world’s top credit rating agencies, has recently made a major move—designing a tailored rating framework specifically for stablecoins. This scheme directly addresses a real issue: seemingly identical stablecoins may have vastly different rating results due to differences in their reserve assets.
Their approach is quite clear. The first step is to decompose each stablecoin’s reserve asset pool, evaluate what assets are inside one by one, and then assess the quality based on the credit ratings of these assets themselves. In other words, even if you claim to be 1:1 pegged to the US dollar, if your reserves are mixed with a bunch of junk bonds or high-risk assets, your rating will naturally decline.
The second step is even more interesting—they will also monitor market value changes. For the same type of asset, risk varies depending on the type and duration, so Moody’s will assign a haircut rate to each asset class. The purpose of this is to prevent situations where the paper figures look good but the actual risks are hidden.
Additionally, Moody’s plans to incorporate operational risk, liquidity risk, and technological risk into the assessment, resulting in an overall final rating. This means that even if your reserves look sufficient, if there are operational management flaws or hidden technical vulnerabilities, your rating will also be downgraded.
Currently, Moody’s is soliciting market comments, with a deadline of January 26, 2026. Once this framework is officially implemented, it will bring more transparent risk assessment standards to the stablecoin market and set higher requirements for project teams.