#加密生态动态追踪 GG has recently made it onto my watchlist. To briefly explain the project's logic: it is a Meme coin based on BNB Chain, with the core selling point being turning donations into a story — each transaction incurs about a 5% tax, all of which go into the treasury of a free education project.
Looking at the key metrics: circulation is about 1 million tokens (fully circulating), currently fluctuating around $90, with a market cap ranging from $88 million to $90 million. The 24-hour trading volume can reach between $40 million and $90 million. This level of liquidity ranks among the top in Meme coins.
What’s most interesting is its “tax-funded education” model. As of mid-November, the project has raised over 11,500 BNB (about $11 million), used for educational initiatives. The team on X continuously confirms the actual use of these funds, emphasizing that this is a community-issued Meme with no direct involvement from the official team — all received tokens are exchanged for mainstream coins used for the educational efforts. This creates an interesting closed loop: trading Meme coins drives donations, and the donation data in turn reinforces the project’s narrative.
This project does have some highlights: genuine donation data, clear use cases, endorsements from multiple exchanges. Compared to pure hype coins, it has a more complete story. But the risks are also evident on-chain — about 80% of the tokens are held by the top 10 addresses, indicating a typical major holder structure. There’s no fundamental valuation model; the price is driven purely by hype, liquidity, and main holder sentiment.
Ultimately, GG is more like a “charity shell wrapped around a high-risk Meme coin” story. The major holders’ control can be a double-edged sword — if you follow the right rhythm, it might skyrocket; if not, there’s no room for negotiation. These emotion-driven tokens require constant risk awareness, but the short-term story’s completeness is worth paying attention to.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RetroHodler91
· 12-16 03:03
The top 10 addresses hold 80% of the chips, which is outrageous. How dare they still chase?
---
Using taxes to fund education is indeed an innovative narrative, but the main players are definitely just harvesting.
---
Liquidity is good, but I'm just worried about a dump later.
---
Donation data being real doesn't matter; the concentration of chips is so high that it can't escape.
---
Wait, is there really 11 million USD spent on education? I need to check.
---
You can't play with emotional coins, brother. Once the hype fades, it's slaughter.
---
The story is complete, but what about the risks written on the chain? Knowing everything yet still chasing.
---
If the main force has one idea, it can cut this thing in half, not worth it.
View OriginalReply0
RiddleMaster
· 12-14 16:46
Top ten addresses hold 80% of the chips. This is the feeling of a casino—if you pick the right one, you'll soar; if you pick the wrong one, you'll go bankrupt.
View OriginalReply0
ProofOfNothing
· 12-13 05:40
The top 10 addresses hold 80% of the chips. Isn't this just a game by the main players? No matter how you phrase it, it can't be changed.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 12-13 05:39
Top 10 addresses hold 80% of the chips, this is outrageous. How can you bet on this?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 12-13 05:36
The top 10 addresses hold 80% of the chips, which is outrageous. How did a public welfare coin turn into a main force's ATM...
View OriginalReply0
WinterWarmthCat
· 12-13 05:35
Top ten addresses hold 80% of the chips. Isn't this just naked whale manipulation? No matter how good the story is told, it can't change this fundamental fact.
View OriginalReply0
ThesisInvestor
· 12-13 05:15
If the main force's 80% chips are involved this time, even the best story is useless.
View OriginalReply0
NewPumpamentals
· 12-13 05:10
The top 10 addresses hold 80% of the chips. What's the point of playing? Just waiting for the main players to cut their losses.
#加密生态动态追踪 GG has recently made it onto my watchlist. To briefly explain the project's logic: it is a Meme coin based on BNB Chain, with the core selling point being turning donations into a story — each transaction incurs about a 5% tax, all of which go into the treasury of a free education project.
Looking at the key metrics: circulation is about 1 million tokens (fully circulating), currently fluctuating around $90, with a market cap ranging from $88 million to $90 million. The 24-hour trading volume can reach between $40 million and $90 million. This level of liquidity ranks among the top in Meme coins.
What’s most interesting is its “tax-funded education” model. As of mid-November, the project has raised over 11,500 BNB (about $11 million), used for educational initiatives. The team on X continuously confirms the actual use of these funds, emphasizing that this is a community-issued Meme with no direct involvement from the official team — all received tokens are exchanged for mainstream coins used for the educational efforts. This creates an interesting closed loop: trading Meme coins drives donations, and the donation data in turn reinforces the project’s narrative.
This project does have some highlights: genuine donation data, clear use cases, endorsements from multiple exchanges. Compared to pure hype coins, it has a more complete story. But the risks are also evident on-chain — about 80% of the tokens are held by the top 10 addresses, indicating a typical major holder structure. There’s no fundamental valuation model; the price is driven purely by hype, liquidity, and main holder sentiment.
Ultimately, GG is more like a “charity shell wrapped around a high-risk Meme coin” story. The major holders’ control can be a double-edged sword — if you follow the right rhythm, it might skyrocket; if not, there’s no room for negotiation. These emotion-driven tokens require constant risk awareness, but the short-term story’s completeness is worth paying attention to.