#加密生态动态追踪 # Vietnam to Launch Digital Asset Transfer Tax in 2026, Traders Face 0.1% New Cost Pressure
Vietnam's crypto regulation is moving towards practical implementation. According to the latest plan, starting from July 1, 2026, digital asset transfer transactions will be officially taxed at 0.1%. For trading groups already struggling in the bear market, this undoubtedly adds another layer of cost.
A quick calculation shows how significant the impact will be. For a $50,000 BTC trade, the tax alone will deduct $50, plus the trading fees charged by the exchange, doubling the cost pressure. At first glance, the 0.1% tax rate seems mild—Vietnam's stock transfer tax is also at this level, and New York State in the U.S. is even considering a 0.2% plan—but in the current low-market, low-profit environment, every additional dollar spent is eating into profit margins.
The background of this matter is that Vietnam has long regarded crypto assets as a gray area, neither explicitly encouraging nor strictly banning them. With the Digital Technology Industry Law incorporating digital assets into the official regulatory framework, taxation is just a supporting measure—there's no issue with the compliance process itself. But the real problem lies here: for retail traders engaging in high-frequency trading, relying on thin margins, and for markets already tight on funds and lacking confidence, what level of difficulty will the dual squeeze of taxes and fees push their survival to? Could this push away more participants?
Rather than passively waiting, it's better to actively think—under such a taxing environment, how should trading strategies be adjusted? How much room is there for cost control? How can one maintain stable profits under the double attack of taxes and market winter? These questions are worth deep consideration for anyone serious about trading.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
liquiditea_sipper
· 12-14 02:59
Here comes another round of harvesting, Vietnam can no longer sit still.
View OriginalReply0
Blockblind
· 12-13 06:40
The same old trick to harvest newbies, Vietnam has also learned it.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOracle
· 12-13 06:30
Vietnam is truly relentless, blatantly harvesting profits.
Another country has started cracking down on crypto. Why do they all seem so coordinated?
0.1% may seem insignificant, but for low-margin traders, it's a death sentence.
Instead of waiting for policies, it's better to consider relocating now.
Southeast Asian traders will have to replan their routes.
50 dollars may seem small, but high-frequency accounts can lose everything in a year.
Why isn't anyone discussing switching to on-chain DEX solutions? Can on-chain trading avoid this tax?
The Vietnamese government really knows how to push people away.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 12-13 06:13
Here comes the harvest again; Vietnam's move is truly brilliant.
#加密生态动态追踪 # Vietnam to Launch Digital Asset Transfer Tax in 2026, Traders Face 0.1% New Cost Pressure
Vietnam's crypto regulation is moving towards practical implementation. According to the latest plan, starting from July 1, 2026, digital asset transfer transactions will be officially taxed at 0.1%. For trading groups already struggling in the bear market, this undoubtedly adds another layer of cost.
A quick calculation shows how significant the impact will be. For a $50,000 BTC trade, the tax alone will deduct $50, plus the trading fees charged by the exchange, doubling the cost pressure. At first glance, the 0.1% tax rate seems mild—Vietnam's stock transfer tax is also at this level, and New York State in the U.S. is even considering a 0.2% plan—but in the current low-market, low-profit environment, every additional dollar spent is eating into profit margins.
The background of this matter is that Vietnam has long regarded crypto assets as a gray area, neither explicitly encouraging nor strictly banning them. With the Digital Technology Industry Law incorporating digital assets into the official regulatory framework, taxation is just a supporting measure—there's no issue with the compliance process itself. But the real problem lies here: for retail traders engaging in high-frequency trading, relying on thin margins, and for markets already tight on funds and lacking confidence, what level of difficulty will the dual squeeze of taxes and fees push their survival to? Could this push away more participants?
Rather than passively waiting, it's better to actively think—under such a taxing environment, how should trading strategies be adjusted? How much room is there for cost control? How can one maintain stable profits under the double attack of taxes and market winter? These questions are worth deep consideration for anyone serious about trading.