Looking at the trading fee structure of the FOLKS token, with such high transaction fees, I really don't know how the main players can bear it. The cost is right there; from a technical and economic perspective, how will the high trading costs affect FOLKS's liquidity and market performance? Is this issue a reflection of the market pricing mechanism, or is it a concern about the project's own liquidity status? Worth pondering.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SandwichTrader
· 12-16 15:37
The fees are so outrageous, you should have run away long ago.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSociety
· 12-14 10:02
High transaction fees are something I've really seen too much of... Every time I think I've discovered something, it turns out to be just another project working for the exchange.
View OriginalReply0
GmGmNoGn
· 12-13 19:51
The transaction fee is so outrageous, no wonder no one is playing.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretDiary
· 12-13 19:49
High transaction fees basically mean low liquidity—if no one is buying or selling, you naturally have to pay more to attract trades.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyOnMainnet
· 12-13 19:41
The transaction fee is so outrageous, retail investors must have already left.
Looking at the trading fee structure of the FOLKS token, with such high transaction fees, I really don't know how the main players can bear it. The cost is right there; from a technical and economic perspective, how will the high trading costs affect FOLKS's liquidity and market performance? Is this issue a reflection of the market pricing mechanism, or is it a concern about the project's own liquidity status? Worth pondering.