I've mentioned this before and I'll say it again—self-custody might not be the move for everyone. Yeah, I know that sounds like heresy in the crypto world, where holding your own keys is supposed to be gospel. But let's be real: most of us got into this space to actually profit, not to lose everything to a hack or end up in serious trouble.

There's this fundamental tension nobody wants to talk about. The whole point of crypto is supposed to be financial sovereignty and cutting out the middleman. That's the dream. But in practice? Self-custody comes with real risks—technical mistakes, security slips, social engineering attacks. One wrong move and your funds vanish. That's not theoretical either.

So here's the uncomfortable truth: for a lot of people, keeping assets on a reputable exchange or using institutional custody solutions makes way more sense than playing security expert. It's not pure decentralization, sure. But it's also not getting rugged or compromised. Sometimes the pragmatic choice beats the ideological one.