By 2025, real-world asset tokenization (RWA) is no longer just conceptual hype but a real market transformation taking place. From financing 200 million yuan worth of photovoltaic assets within 72 hours, to the ongoing expansion of over 28 billion USD RWA funds by leading global asset management institutions, and to the Swiss carbon credit trading market exceeding 1.27 billion USD in annual trading volume, this wave is rapidly rewriting the global financial landscape with visible speed.



Key figures are in front of us: a 90% increase in financing efficiency, a 40% reduction in costs, and investment thresholds dropping from millions to just 1 USD. What does this mean? Traditional finance assets like US Treasuries, commercial real estate, and energy assets, once only accessible to institutions, are now open to ordinary investors.

Here's a practical example. A leading asset management firm launched the BUIDL fund, which fractionalized US short-term Treasury bonds via blockchain. In less than 90 days since launch, the fund's scale more than doubled, attracting investors from 152 countries, with institutional investors accounting for as much as 67%. What does this indicate? It shows that this isn’t just a retail game; institutions are also seriously deploying their strategies.

But there’s a real-world issue: there are so many RWA projects that it’s hard to tell the truly promising ones from the rest. Many projects claim "asset tokenization" but are essentially just hyping concepts. The key to distinguishing genuine projects from pseudo-projects lies in one point: do they truly solve the "liquidity deadlock" of traditional assets?

Why are assets like US Treasuries, real estate, and infrastructure difficult to circulate in traditional finance? Because of lengthy transaction cycles, high participation thresholds, and information asymmetry. After going on-chain, 24/7 trading becomes normal, automatic profit distribution eliminates middlemen, and financing efficiency doubles. This is the real value of RWA.

In other words, RWA isn’t about creating new assets but about activating trillions of dollars’ worth of assets that are originally frozen within the traditional financial system. The opportunity is right in front of us; the question is whether you can identify projects with genuine business backing, rather than blindly following those empty shells that only have tokens but no assets.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainDetectivevip
· 21h ago
Got it. The BUIDL wave is indeed different this time. The fact that institutions hold 67% indicates that this is no longer just about cutting leeks. The key is to clearly distinguish which assets are truly being activated and which are just炒概念 (speculative hype). Starting with a $1 investment sounds great, but there are definitely many pitfalls... Just checking whether a project has real business support behind it can filter out most fake projects. A $28 billion fund is expanding, which shows that big money has long understood this. We need to learn to read financial reports, not just charts. The angle of liquidity dead zones is quite good. Traditional finance freezing those trillion-level assets truly deserves to be activated.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTherapistvip
· 12-15 14:46
The filter is broken. RWA is really about who can find that 1% that isn't a shell project now. --- Hearing that 200 million yuan was raised in 72 hours sounds great, but I want to know what’s behind those photovoltaic assets... Is it really just another round of hot potato? --- Wait, lowering the threshold from millions to 1 dollar? That sounds like financial democratization, but it might just be treating retail investors as bagholders. --- BUIDL doubling in growth is indeed impressive, but the fact that 67% are institutional investors makes me a bit uneasy... What game are they playing? --- In plain words: only RWA with real cash flow are worth watching; the rest are just old tricks in new clothes. --- Activating trillion-dollar assets sounds tempting, but how much of that trillion can actually flow? I bet 10 bucks most of it is still dead. --- There are so many articles praising RWA now that it’s frightening, but very few can clearly explain "why this isn’t a scam." --- I’ve heard the phrase "opportunity is right in front of you" too many times... but I’ve never seen my wallet actually encounter a real opportunity. --- Is it just me, or do I think the biggest problem with RWA isn’t the technology, but whether regulators will actually give you this license?
View OriginalReply0
BankruptcyArtistvip
· 12-15 14:39
Cost reduction by 40%? Sounds great, but 99% of RWA projects are still just air. How many can truly solve liquidity issues? Just take a closer look and you'll see. The BUIDL doubling thing indicates that institutions are the main players; retail investors, don't just join the hype. The on-chain US debt set feels interesting but what about the risks? No one has clearly explained. Participate with $1? Show me ten real projects first; right now, it's all just conceptual games. 72 hours to raise 200 million in photovoltaic? Come on, that's an exception. Don't be fooled by the numbers. Distinguishing genuine projects from fake ones sounds easy, but if it were that simple, I would have gotten rich already. Opportunities are right in front of us, no doubt, but traps are also right in front of us. 24/7 trading sounds wonderful, but what about liquidity premiums? The claim of activating trillion-dollar assets is a bit of an overstatement.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifiervip
· 12-15 14:25
ngl, those efficiency numbers need serious auditing before i'm convinced. 90% improvement in traditional finance? smells statistically improbable tbh... where's the underlying asset validation? seen too many "rwa projects" with zero actual collateral backing
Reply0
SerumSqueezervip
· 12-15 14:23
72 hours of financing 200 million? I really need to check out what project that is, I've been wanting to get on the photovoltaic bandwagon for a while. --- Wait, institutional participation accounts for 67%, retail investors still have to look at their faces. --- It's the same old rhetoric again—liquidity dead spots, activating trillion-dollar assets... How many times have I heard that last year? How many people actually made money? --- The $1 threshold sounds great, but I'm afraid it's just the last ride to cut my $10,000. --- BUIDL doubling in size? But for us latecomers, whose orders are we going to take? It's terrifying to think about. --- Damn, why didn't you guys say earlier that those shells only have tokens and no assets? My money's been frozen in. --- 24-hour trading, automatic distribution... sounds way better than traditional finance, but the risks probably multiply too. --- 152 countries' investors sound impressive, but the real money is still with those institutions; we're just betting on popularity. --- The question is, how to identify them? If they have business support and are just hyping concepts, they all look the same, right? --- RWA is really a wave, but it feels a bit late to get in now. Probably all just bagholders.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)