#美联储降息 Federal Reserve Board member Milan's recent remarks are quite interesting—he mentioned that inflation is already close to the policy target, and then suggested that the current tightening stance might actually be overdone. But his logic is a bit awkward: opposing a 25 basis point cut yet supporting a 50 basis point cut, there's quite a gap in between. It seems that there are indeed disagreements within the Federal Reserve about the pace of policy adjustments.



Interestingly, Bitcoin dropped tonight, and some people linked this to Milan's comments. But upon closer reflection, the relationship might not be that direct. Milan's stance actually reflects the Fed's dilemma between controlling inflation and supporting economic growth—cutting rates to boost growth, yet fearing a rebound in inflation. This uncertainty itself can easily trigger market volatility. The price movement of $BTC is often more influenced by market expectations of overall liquidity rather than a single official's statement. The key is whether the Fed's upcoming actions can be effectively implemented.
BTC1.54%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GmGmNoGnvip
· 12-15 16:23
Milan, this move is a bit funny. 25 points aren't enough, it has to be 50? The Fed's people are also unpredictable inside. Drop is a drop, don't blame everything on the officials. Liquidity is the key, alright. Expect the Fed to be consistent in words and actions? Then I'm too naive.
View OriginalReply0
BearHuggervip
· 12-15 16:22
Milan's logic is indeed convoluted. 25 basis points aren't enough; 50 basis points, maybe? That's exactly how the Federal Reserve operates—saying one thing and doing another.
View OriginalReply0
NftMetaversePaintervip
· 12-15 16:18
actually this fed pivot narrative is kinda fascinating from a liquidity algorithm perspective... miller's contradictory stance basically reveals the computational paradox inherent in monetary policy—it's like watching a generative algorithm fail to converge on stable parameters, ngl
Reply0
RektButAlivevip
· 12-15 16:09
Milan's logic is indeed a bit confusing, opposing 25 but supporting 50, are they messing around?
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarryvip
· 12-15 16:04
lmao the classic fed pivot theater—milan's basically saying "no 25bps but also yes 50bps" like dude just pick a lane. this is literally the opportunity cost problem they can't solve: either tank growth or risk reinflation, no in between.
Reply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)