Recent actions by the Federal Reserve are truly perplexing. On the surface, they frequently signal rate cuts, but the reality is far more complex.
Let's start with the policy level. Seven senior officials within the Fed are explicitly opposed to further rate cuts, which already indicates significant disagreement. Powell's recent remarks are even more ambiguous, suggesting that there may only be two rate cuts between 2026 and 2027 — far below market expectations. In other words, the Fed is not as eager to loosen policy as it appears.
Regarding inflation, the Fed's stance is relatively optimistic. They believe current inflation pressures are not the main concern, and they are more worried about the employment situation. However, there's a detail: recent US employment data showed a discrepancy of 60,000 jobs, caused by operational disruptions at the White House leading to missing statistics. This gap is expected to be gradually filled between January and February next year.
Combining these pieces of information, the Fed's attitude is quite clear — there is no explicit intention to rescue the market. The real conditions that could trigger significant action are quite specific: only if employment data declines for two to three consecutive months will they take decisive steps to stabilize the market and liquidity in cryptocurrencies. But historically, every liquidity injection has been accompanied by the risk of a hard landing for the economy. This may be the key area to watch closely in the coming period.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProposalDetective
· 12-15 16:50
Powell is really just putting on a show here, with signals of rate cuts flying everywhere but actually only two times? Retail investors are still dreaming.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryer
· 12-15 16:48
Wait a minute, Powell's move was really just a feint.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBlindCat
· 12-15 16:45
Powell's approach is indeed a way to cut the chives, just waiting for the moment when employment data breaks through.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 12-15 16:29
Powell is playing word games again; anyway, saving the market or not saving it is not urgent.
Wait for two more months of poor employment data; that will be the real test.
Signals of rate cuts are being released every day. Will they actually take action? Haha, it's not that simple.
Fighting within the Federal Reserve, the market is still dreaming of a bailout, laughable.
Once liquidity arrives, the economy will have to hard land; whether this trade is worthwhile is really uncertain.
Instead of guessing what Powell is thinking, it's better to look at employment data; that’s the real core.
Without a 2 to 3 month decline in employment, the Fed won't move at all. We're all too naive.
Bailout? Rest assured, it's not on their priority list.
View OriginalReply0
governance_lurker
· 12-15 16:25
Powell is again making empty promises; we've seen this trick too many times.
Recent actions by the Federal Reserve are truly perplexing. On the surface, they frequently signal rate cuts, but the reality is far more complex.
Let's start with the policy level. Seven senior officials within the Fed are explicitly opposed to further rate cuts, which already indicates significant disagreement. Powell's recent remarks are even more ambiguous, suggesting that there may only be two rate cuts between 2026 and 2027 — far below market expectations. In other words, the Fed is not as eager to loosen policy as it appears.
Regarding inflation, the Fed's stance is relatively optimistic. They believe current inflation pressures are not the main concern, and they are more worried about the employment situation. However, there's a detail: recent US employment data showed a discrepancy of 60,000 jobs, caused by operational disruptions at the White House leading to missing statistics. This gap is expected to be gradually filled between January and February next year.
Combining these pieces of information, the Fed's attitude is quite clear — there is no explicit intention to rescue the market. The real conditions that could trigger significant action are quite specific: only if employment data declines for two to three consecutive months will they take decisive steps to stabilize the market and liquidity in cryptocurrencies. But historically, every liquidity injection has been accompanied by the risk of a hard landing for the economy. This may be the key area to watch closely in the coming period.