Many people think that the market makers seem to have endless money, but have you really thought about where that money comes from?
Let me explain how this system operates. Ordinary financial financing costs are generally around 5%. For urgent projects or those with slightly higher risks, the financing cost can spike to 10%. For individual financing, the cost is even higher, usually not exceeding 15%.
But the crypto world is different. If a team doesn't have enough startup capital, they have to seek financing or collaborate with market makers. The cost of using these funds is conservatively estimated to start at 20%. The usual usage cycle is within one month; in other words: if you currently have $1 million USD, and a middleman approaches you for project financing, promising to pay back $1.2 million within a month. This number sounds frightening, but it's not unusual in this circle. The prerequisite is that you're willing to lend out the money—because this carries real risk. It's not like as soon as you become a market maker, you’re guaranteed to make a profit; large players still eat small fish in this market.
So how can you profit from financing costs? The way is: first, earn this financing cost to keep trading active, then do a round of harvesting. From another perspective, if a project can openly manipulate the market and do so recklessly, it must have strong backing. This isn’t a secret, it’s just something you don’t usually think about.
Currently, some tokens in the market are engaged in liquidity hunting, with manipulations on both upward and downward swings. I can't specify exactly on which platform or against which trading pairs; the details are unclear, but it boils down to the two main exchanges. From the exchanges’ perspective, they definitely don’t want to be used as pawns. Currently, the funding rates are still within acceptable ranges, the deviation in price isn’t too crazy, and the bearish sentiment isn’t as intense as before. Many have shifted to a more bullish outlook after being scared earlier.
What happens if the market takes an extreme turn? That will be a different story then.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ChainPoet
· 12-15 18:52
Basically, it's a game of capital costs. I've known for a long time that it starts at 20 points. The key is whether you're willing to play this game—risk equals reward. Some people make crazy profits, while others get liquidated directly.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 12-15 18:51
Basically, it's like hot potato; in the end, retail investors are the ones who get stuck holding the bag.
View OriginalReply0
YieldFarmRefugee
· 12-15 18:34
Here are three comments with different styles:
---
Basically, it's just the cost of harvesting the leeks. 20 basis points are nothing, projects with backing can still double and cut.
---
Wait, isn't this logic just spreading the financing costs onto retail investors? No wonder the crypto world is so messed up.
---
When the market moves to extremes, the first to die are definitely those of us without backing. It's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapist
· 12-15 18:28
Basically, it's just borrowing high-interest loans and then cashing out the newbies; the tricks are outdated.
Many people think that the market makers seem to have endless money, but have you really thought about where that money comes from?
Let me explain how this system operates. Ordinary financial financing costs are generally around 5%. For urgent projects or those with slightly higher risks, the financing cost can spike to 10%. For individual financing, the cost is even higher, usually not exceeding 15%.
But the crypto world is different. If a team doesn't have enough startup capital, they have to seek financing or collaborate with market makers. The cost of using these funds is conservatively estimated to start at 20%. The usual usage cycle is within one month; in other words: if you currently have $1 million USD, and a middleman approaches you for project financing, promising to pay back $1.2 million within a month. This number sounds frightening, but it's not unusual in this circle. The prerequisite is that you're willing to lend out the money—because this carries real risk. It's not like as soon as you become a market maker, you’re guaranteed to make a profit; large players still eat small fish in this market.
So how can you profit from financing costs? The way is: first, earn this financing cost to keep trading active, then do a round of harvesting. From another perspective, if a project can openly manipulate the market and do so recklessly, it must have strong backing. This isn’t a secret, it’s just something you don’t usually think about.
Currently, some tokens in the market are engaged in liquidity hunting, with manipulations on both upward and downward swings. I can't specify exactly on which platform or against which trading pairs; the details are unclear, but it boils down to the two main exchanges. From the exchanges’ perspective, they definitely don’t want to be used as pawns. Currently, the funding rates are still within acceptable ranges, the deviation in price isn’t too crazy, and the bearish sentiment isn’t as intense as before. Many have shifted to a more bullish outlook after being scared earlier.
What happens if the market takes an extreme turn? That will be a different story then.