The Islamic financial world faces a dilemma: nearly 1.9 billion Muslims worldwide are interested in cryptocurrency trading, but many popular trading modes are considered (Sharia) non-compliant under Islamic legal norms. The issue is not with the trading idea itself but with its technical implementation. Various platforms already claim Sharia compliance without undergoing thorough scrutiny.
The two core problems of leveraged trading
The Haram concept (Islamically impermissible) in leverage and futures trading is based on two fundamental principles of Islamic financial law:
Problem 1: The interest component in leverage
When a trading platform lends money and charges interest or flat fees, it violates the Islamic prohibition of Riba (interest). However: a profit-dependent fee structure is not forbidden. The solution would be a model where platforms only charge fees on successful transactions and remain free in case of losses. To cover failed trades, profit-sharing could be calibrated accordingly – an approach from which both sides would benefit.
Problem 2: The sale of non-existent assets
Margin and futures contracts are legally based on the sale of positions that the trader does not actually own. This violates the Islamic principle of ownership. A technical workaround: the platform could provide leveraged funds only temporarily and for specific purposes to open a position, then lock them and automatically credit back upon closing the position. This would preserve the principle that no one sells something they do not control.
Spot trading as an alternative – but with limitations
Spot trading fully meets the (Islamically permissible) requirements. The disadvantage: the return prospects are significantly lower than leveraged instruments. The potential lies in merging modern fintech structures with traditional Islamic financial principles.
The market does not sleep
The interface between cryptographic financial innovation and religious compliance is no longer a niche issue. With nearly two billion potential users, this is a relevant market factor. Platforms that develop technical solutions meeting both requirements – high profitability and Sharia compliance – could tap into a massive, as yet untapped market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Is derivatives trading permissible in Islam? A technical analysis of Sharia compliance
The Islamic financial world faces a dilemma: nearly 1.9 billion Muslims worldwide are interested in cryptocurrency trading, but many popular trading modes are considered (Sharia) non-compliant under Islamic legal norms. The issue is not with the trading idea itself but with its technical implementation. Various platforms already claim Sharia compliance without undergoing thorough scrutiny.
The two core problems of leveraged trading
The Haram concept (Islamically impermissible) in leverage and futures trading is based on two fundamental principles of Islamic financial law:
Problem 1: The interest component in leverage
When a trading platform lends money and charges interest or flat fees, it violates the Islamic prohibition of Riba (interest). However: a profit-dependent fee structure is not forbidden. The solution would be a model where platforms only charge fees on successful transactions and remain free in case of losses. To cover failed trades, profit-sharing could be calibrated accordingly – an approach from which both sides would benefit.
Problem 2: The sale of non-existent assets
Margin and futures contracts are legally based on the sale of positions that the trader does not actually own. This violates the Islamic principle of ownership. A technical workaround: the platform could provide leveraged funds only temporarily and for specific purposes to open a position, then lock them and automatically credit back upon closing the position. This would preserve the principle that no one sells something they do not control.
Spot trading as an alternative – but with limitations
Spot trading fully meets the (Islamically permissible) requirements. The disadvantage: the return prospects are significantly lower than leveraged instruments. The potential lies in merging modern fintech structures with traditional Islamic financial principles.
The market does not sleep
The interface between cryptographic financial innovation and religious compliance is no longer a niche issue. With nearly two billion potential users, this is a relevant market factor. Platforms that develop technical solutions meeting both requirements – high profitability and Sharia compliance – could tap into a massive, as yet untapped market.