Quantitative fund Capriole founder Charles Edwards recently proposed a thought-provoking view: if Bitcoin does not have quantum resistance by 2028, its price could fall below $50,000.
Does that sound a bit exaggerated? Actually, the logic behind it is like this. Quantum computing theoretically can crack existing encryption algorithms, directly exposing user private keys. This poses a potential threat to the entire blockchain industry and has been a long-term focus within the industry. Edwards' assessment is that this risk window could open by 2028, and if the ecosystem does not respond quickly enough, market confidence could be undermined.
However, there are also voices of skepticism. Opponents believe that practical quantum computing still requires decades to become feasible, and the threat is overstated. Moreover, to be conservative, traditional targets like banks and financial systems do not have encryption strength higher than Bitcoin, so they would face the impact first. This logic also holds up.
The key still depends on how quickly the industry acts. Research and development of quantum-resistant algorithms are already underway, but moving from theory to implementation and then to a network-wide upgrade takes time. 2028 is a reference point, and it could also just be a warning.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-ccc36bc5
· 5h ago
You need to upgrade quickly before 2028, or it might really drop below 50,000? Feels a bit exaggerated, quantum computing is still in its early stages.
View OriginalReply0
LayoffMiner
· 5h ago
Here we go again with the 2028 scenario. This guy just wants to create anxiety.
Quantum computing threats do exist, but no one can really predict the timeline.
Banking systems will also be breached, so why only scare the crypto world?
Instead of waiting for 2028, it's better to see who is actually working on quantum-resistant solutions.
This time it's really not FUD; it's just a bit premature to be shouting about it.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWang
· 5h ago
It's just alarmist talk; the banking system will be breached first, Bitcoin won't be affected.
Quantitative fund Capriole founder Charles Edwards recently proposed a thought-provoking view: if Bitcoin does not have quantum resistance by 2028, its price could fall below $50,000.
Does that sound a bit exaggerated? Actually, the logic behind it is like this. Quantum computing theoretically can crack existing encryption algorithms, directly exposing user private keys. This poses a potential threat to the entire blockchain industry and has been a long-term focus within the industry. Edwards' assessment is that this risk window could open by 2028, and if the ecosystem does not respond quickly enough, market confidence could be undermined.
However, there are also voices of skepticism. Opponents believe that practical quantum computing still requires decades to become feasible, and the threat is overstated. Moreover, to be conservative, traditional targets like banks and financial systems do not have encryption strength higher than Bitcoin, so they would face the impact first. This logic also holds up.
The key still depends on how quickly the industry acts. Research and development of quantum-resistant algorithms are already underway, but moving from theory to implementation and then to a network-wide upgrade takes time. 2028 is a reference point, and it could also just be a warning.