In the early hours, a single message instantly stirred the entire crypto ecosystem. Trump publicly stated "All cryptocurrencies must undergo strict regulation." As soon as this news broke, Bitcoin dropped below $64,000, and over $350 million was liquidated across the network within an hour. The market fell into a typical panic mode—large-scale buy-the-dip and frantic withdrawals happening simultaneously.
But amidst this chaos, I noticed an interesting phenomenon: while everyone was arguing whether to buy the dip or run away, more and more funds were quietly flowing into decentralized stablecoins. This made me rethink a question: during periods of high policy uncertainty, what do we truly need?
**Two voices, one truth**
The market is now divided into two camps. One says regulation is coming, so exit quickly; the other shouts "Historical bottom, buy now." But both overlook a more painful reality—when faced with black swan events, what you need is not to bet on the right direction, but "certainty."
Many so-called hot coins become fragile at such moments. Their value is often based on "future narratives," and narratives fear policy changes the most. Once regulatory expectations reverse, these coins can quickly go from hot favorites to hot potatoes.
**Why have stablecoins suddenly become valuable**
In contrast, decentralized stablecoins with transparent underlying assets and clear mechanisms demonstrate their value in such times. The reasons are simple:
First, structural advantages. Centralized stablecoins face a fatal weakness—regulatory risk. If policy directions change, your accounts could be frozen, and assets locked. But decentralized architecture is different; there are no single points of failure, and no possibility of "freezing." In times of policy uncertainty, this is the greatest safeguard.
Second, transparency of mechanisms. Stablecoins like USDD, which are over-collateralized, always have their collateralization ratio on-chain, allowing real-time verification. This transparency is especially valuable in volatile markets—at least you know what supports the asset, rather than blindly trusting promises from centralized institutions.
Additionally, during extreme market fluctuations, stablecoins become the most precious liquidity storage. When you're unsure of the next move, converting assets into stablecoins can hedge against price risks and maintain the ability to enter the market at any time. It’s like in a high-stakes game—convert chips into cash during intense betting, so you can immediately follow up on favorable cards.
**The dilemma of real-world choices**
Many investors around me have tasted gains during this volatility, but some have also suffered losses. Those caught in the downturn are mostly overly concentrated in a single hot coin. Conversely, those who converted part of their assets into stablecoins early on have had the chance to breathe and redeploy.
This isn’t to say you shouldn’t participate in risk assets, but risk management becomes especially critical in extreme conditions. Policy risk, market risk, technical risk—these are all objective realities. How to survive and find opportunities amid these risks depends on how well prepared you are.
The significance of decentralized stablecoins lies in providing an additional option—during uncertain times, offering a relatively stable store of value. It’s not about being unwilling to part with everything, but having a reliable landing point at critical moments.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BrokeBeans
· 21h ago
Here comes another one, Trump’s mouth really is a money-making machine
This round of stablecoins has indeed been played smartly, the centralized approach should have been abandoned long ago
Regulatory storms are coming, and you’re all in on hot coins? Serves you right for getting caught
I just want to ask, are your USDD really that safe?
Talking about bottom-fishing is easy, but when the time comes to lose, everyone wants to run
Certainty sounds good, but I still can’t trust any institution’s promises
I actually sold off during this wave of volatility, just want to stay alive first
Stablecoins as liquidity tools are indeed pretty good, at least they allow a breather
Those who are overly concentrated in hot coins should wake up
Policy uncertainties are unpredictable, it’s better to prepare multiple strategies
Your analysis somehow feels a bit like a sales pitch to me
Decentralization sounds appealing, but are the risks really diversified?
And within the 350 million liquidation, there are probably quite a few unwitting victims
View OriginalReply0
Ser_APY_2000
· 21h ago
It's the same old Trump style, I really can't hold it anymore.
Wait, are stablecoins really taking off? Why didn't I notice?
Holding stablecoins is like holding onto life itself. This time, I finally believe it.
3.5 billion in liquidation, which means some people still didn't do their homework.
Decentralized stablecoins are indeed attractive, with maximum transparency.
Those friends who all-in on a certain coin are probably crying right now.
I just want to ask, is USDD really safe? Honestly, no lies.
Risk management is easy to talk about, but few can actually do it well.
So what should I do now? Stock up on stablecoins or keep betting on the trend?
This wave of the market has indeed exposed many coins' true and false qualities.
I've already diversified my assets long ago, so now I’m not panicking.
View OriginalReply0
APY_Chaser
· 22h ago
Here we go again with the stablecoins, but I really don't understand why it has to be USDD...
Wait, the flow of funds into stablecoins is indeed quite interesting.
This round clearly shows who is serious about risk control and who is gambling.
Holding more stablecoins isn't wrong, but don't really think you can dodge black swans.
Ultimately, it depends on when you convert your chips into cash; selling too early means losing everything, waiting too long is pointless.
I think those who managed to survive this time should thank those who reduced their positions early. Now, there are plenty of people full of regret.
The word "certainty" sounds good, but when regulation really comes, stablecoins might not be so stable either.
Speaking of which, a 350 million liquidation in the early morning—how many people must be unable to sleep?
In the early hours, a single message instantly stirred the entire crypto ecosystem. Trump publicly stated "All cryptocurrencies must undergo strict regulation." As soon as this news broke, Bitcoin dropped below $64,000, and over $350 million was liquidated across the network within an hour. The market fell into a typical panic mode—large-scale buy-the-dip and frantic withdrawals happening simultaneously.
But amidst this chaos, I noticed an interesting phenomenon: while everyone was arguing whether to buy the dip or run away, more and more funds were quietly flowing into decentralized stablecoins. This made me rethink a question: during periods of high policy uncertainty, what do we truly need?
**Two voices, one truth**
The market is now divided into two camps. One says regulation is coming, so exit quickly; the other shouts "Historical bottom, buy now." But both overlook a more painful reality—when faced with black swan events, what you need is not to bet on the right direction, but "certainty."
Many so-called hot coins become fragile at such moments. Their value is often based on "future narratives," and narratives fear policy changes the most. Once regulatory expectations reverse, these coins can quickly go from hot favorites to hot potatoes.
**Why have stablecoins suddenly become valuable**
In contrast, decentralized stablecoins with transparent underlying assets and clear mechanisms demonstrate their value in such times. The reasons are simple:
First, structural advantages. Centralized stablecoins face a fatal weakness—regulatory risk. If policy directions change, your accounts could be frozen, and assets locked. But decentralized architecture is different; there are no single points of failure, and no possibility of "freezing." In times of policy uncertainty, this is the greatest safeguard.
Second, transparency of mechanisms. Stablecoins like USDD, which are over-collateralized, always have their collateralization ratio on-chain, allowing real-time verification. This transparency is especially valuable in volatile markets—at least you know what supports the asset, rather than blindly trusting promises from centralized institutions.
Additionally, during extreme market fluctuations, stablecoins become the most precious liquidity storage. When you're unsure of the next move, converting assets into stablecoins can hedge against price risks and maintain the ability to enter the market at any time. It’s like in a high-stakes game—convert chips into cash during intense betting, so you can immediately follow up on favorable cards.
**The dilemma of real-world choices**
Many investors around me have tasted gains during this volatility, but some have also suffered losses. Those caught in the downturn are mostly overly concentrated in a single hot coin. Conversely, those who converted part of their assets into stablecoins early on have had the chance to breathe and redeploy.
This isn’t to say you shouldn’t participate in risk assets, but risk management becomes especially critical in extreme conditions. Policy risk, market risk, technical risk—these are all objective realities. How to survive and find opportunities amid these risks depends on how well prepared you are.
The significance of decentralized stablecoins lies in providing an additional option—during uncertain times, offering a relatively stable store of value. It’s not about being unwilling to part with everything, but having a reliable landing point at critical moments.