#美国就业数据表现强劲超出预期 Bitcoin is transitioning from digital currency to financial infrastructure, and a modular, composable system architecture has become the inevitable choice. If traditional finance requires banks, exchanges, and clearinghouses to each perform their duties, then the Bitcoin ecosystem also needs a multi-layered infrastructure network that connects secure settlement, asset creation, and application innovation.

How should the architecture be built? A layered approach is the clearest. The bottom layer is settlement and security—using the Bitcoin mainnet and Babylon staking mechanism as the ultimate trust source to ensure all transactions and assets have a solid anchor. Above that is the asset and liquidity layer, where interest-bearing assets (such as standardized products like stBTC) are minted, allowing these assets to circulate freely within the ecosystem and serve as "public currency."

Next is the protocol and application layer—providing modular financial tools such as lending, trading, and derivatives, enabling developers to build quickly like stacking building blocks. The top layer of expansion and aggregation connects liquidity across multiple chains, consolidating scattered resources into an efficient network.

The core value of this system lies in standardization and modularity. Standardization reduces collaboration costs within the ecosystem, while modularity accelerates innovation cycles. For $BANK holders, the significance is multi-dimensional: directly sharing the ongoing benefits generated by widespread adoption of this infrastructure, participating in development decisions through voting rights, and earning growth dividends as ecosystem contributors.

From another perspective, the future of Bitcoin is like a digital city—requiring roads, power grids, and water supply systems. Lorenzo Protocol aims to be the provider of those most fundamental and critical infrastructure. $BANK is the proof of stake that participates in city building and shares in prosperity.

The question is: do you think priority should be given to strengthening the security of the underlying layer, or to enhancing user-facing application experience?