#BTC资金流动性 Prediction markets are becoming increasingly competitive between Polymarket and Predict. One focuses on on-chain interaction, while the other offers more innovative gameplay. It seems that which of these two can capture more liquidity in the future will determine the overall landscape of the sector. What do you think? Which one do you believe has greater development potential?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnlyUpOnly
· 2025-12-21 19:36
Polymarket has already seen liquidity coming in, but the new gameplay from Predict is indeed interesting... To be honest, whoever attracts the celebrity users will win.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleSurfer
· 2025-12-20 04:15
Honestly, I'm already tired of Polymarket's on-chain interactions. The innovative gameplay on Predict is definitely more appealing to me. However, when it comes to liquidity, it still depends on who can secure more capital support.
View OriginalReply0
SerumDegen
· 2025-12-19 06:33
polymarket's got the on-chain signals locked but predict's got that fresh narrative flowing... honestly whoever doesn't get liquidated first wins this cascade lol
Reply0
DaoResearcher
· 2025-12-19 06:31
According to the data model in the white paper, Polymarket's AMM design actually has an incentive misalignment issue.
Predict's governance proposal voting participation is indeed higher, but the liquidity depth still falls short.
Honestly, which one can survive until the end depends on the Token economics design; it's too early to draw conclusions now.
To be honest, on-chain interactions are just superficial; the core issue is whose market maker incentive mechanism is more reasonable.
From the liquidity data, the prediction market sector is far from being settled.
It seems both are solving the same problem—how to retain liquidity providers, which is the key.
Polymarket's main advantage is still the first-mover advantage, but Predict's innovative mechanism definitely has room for imagination.
It is worth noting that the long-term survival rate of such projects actually depends on the stability of community governance, not just liquidity.
#BTC资金流动性 Prediction markets are becoming increasingly competitive between Polymarket and Predict. One focuses on on-chain interaction, while the other offers more innovative gameplay. It seems that which of these two can capture more liquidity in the future will determine the overall landscape of the sector. What do you think? Which one do you believe has greater development potential?