What does it take to bottom fish in a bear market? Simply put, it's about betting on certainty.
Let's see how institutions are playing their cards: BTC is their ballast, they’ve been accumulating at low costs early on, and their unrealized gains are quite stable. In contrast, ETH has many institutions standing guard at high levels, facing pressure to reduce their positions. The difference is significant.
From a fundamental perspective: BTC is synonymous with digital gold, and this consensus is unshakable. As for ETH? Its fate as a technical product is threatened by internal competition and AI-driven diversification, which reduces its certainty.
The easiest trap for retail investors—small capital, unable to withstand ETH’s uncertainties—any slight fluctuation can crush their confidence. On the other hand, large funds can endure even longer cycles.
So, the logic for bottom fishing in a bear market is clear: **Prioritize buying BTC first, and only consider ETH once institutions have truly stabilized**. Don’t overthink liquidity; following the path of certainty is the safest bet.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SnapshotBot
· 21h ago
Exactly right, institutions have long regarded BTC as an ATM, while retail investors are still struggling to see if ETH can turn things around. The gap is enormous.
View OriginalReply0
SerRugResistant
· 21h ago
Exactly right, the institutions' move to accumulate BTC at low levels was truly a masterstroke. When will we retail investors learn to be this patient and stop chasing hot trends?
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentSage
· 21h ago
You're right, certainty is really valuable. BTC is the ballast, while ETH has too many pitfalls.
Retail investors' mentality collapses the fastest; this single difference can be fatal.
Following big funds is always better than guessing blindly.
BTC has already made its stance clear, institutions have long set up the game, and we're late to realize and pick up the leaks.
Things that lack certainty are really not worth touching; it's exhausting.
What does it take to bottom fish in a bear market? Simply put, it's about betting on certainty.
Let's see how institutions are playing their cards: BTC is their ballast, they’ve been accumulating at low costs early on, and their unrealized gains are quite stable. In contrast, ETH has many institutions standing guard at high levels, facing pressure to reduce their positions. The difference is significant.
From a fundamental perspective: BTC is synonymous with digital gold, and this consensus is unshakable. As for ETH? Its fate as a technical product is threatened by internal competition and AI-driven diversification, which reduces its certainty.
The easiest trap for retail investors—small capital, unable to withstand ETH’s uncertainties—any slight fluctuation can crush their confidence. On the other hand, large funds can endure even longer cycles.
So, the logic for bottom fishing in a bear market is clear: **Prioritize buying BTC first, and only consider ETH once institutions have truly stabilized**. Don’t overthink liquidity; following the path of certainty is the safest bet.