Another day, another rewards cycle ending. Just caught the final batch of peaq airdrops and honestly, it hits different when you know it's the last one.
Not gonna lie—watching the team wind down the incentive program stings a little. But here's the thing: these reward initiatives are deceptively easy to launch, right? Throw some tokens at users, watch engagement spike. Problem is, keeping it sustainable? That's the real puzzle. The numbers don't lie. If the rewards aren't translating into long-term retention and actual protocol usage, you're basically bleeding capital with nothing to show for it down the line.
It's the hard truth nobody wants to admit when they're hunting APY—programs built on unsustainable incentives eventually collapse. The projects that make it are the ones willing to make these tough calls early.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 20h ago
Honestly, I still felt a bit uncomfortable during the last airdrop, but after the team did this, I actually have more confidence in them.
View OriginalReply0
MaticHoleFiller
· 12-19 15:49
Got it. The end of incentives is actually a good thing. Genuine users and those trying to exploit the system can be distinguished immediately.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleInTraining
· 12-19 15:45
Speaking of which, this wave of peaq is really generous, even in the last phase with such a big move. But I have to say, after seeing through this trick, I'm not that excited anymore.
The worst are those projects that rely solely on airdrops to attract users; their data looks good, but when you check user retention rates, it's all fake. They will fail sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageur
· 12-19 15:44
honestly the peaq airdrop ending hits different when you actually run the numbers on it. like yeah, unsustainable yield farms always implode—been watching this cycle repeat since 2021. retained users or bust.
Another day, another rewards cycle ending. Just caught the final batch of peaq airdrops and honestly, it hits different when you know it's the last one.
Not gonna lie—watching the team wind down the incentive program stings a little. But here's the thing: these reward initiatives are deceptively easy to launch, right? Throw some tokens at users, watch engagement spike. Problem is, keeping it sustainable? That's the real puzzle. The numbers don't lie. If the rewards aren't translating into long-term retention and actual protocol usage, you're basically bleeding capital with nothing to show for it down the line.
It's the hard truth nobody wants to admit when they're hunting APY—programs built on unsustainable incentives eventually collapse. The projects that make it are the ones willing to make these tough calls early.