Late at night, a data chart showing "Cryptocurrency markets have all fallen 31% after three rate hikes in Japan" circulated across major communities, but one big holder acted quickly—converting several million assets into decentralized stablecoins. This is not a panic sell to cut losses, but rather a preparation for the upcoming market turbulence.
With the Bank of Japan's rate hike imminent, the market is once again filled with familiar panic. Does a rate hike mean a crash? This logic seems straightforward, but in reality, it hides a huge cognitive misconception. The true culprit behind each decline is actually different. The recent adjustments in the crypto market over the past few years reveal the truth only upon careful analysis.
The plunge in March last year was fundamentally a technical correction after Bitcoin soared from 24,000 to 73,000 within half a year—that was a necessary pullback. Japan's first rate hike in 17 years? That was just the last straw that broke the camel's back.
By July, the situation became more complex. Japan's rate hike coincided with worsening US unemployment data, and once recession expectations appeared, the global market began a collective deleveraging. That was the real "double kill."
In January this year, the driving force shifted again to geopolitical risks—the new government's policy expectations disrupted the market rhythm.
It may seem that all these are caused by rate hikes, but the actual logical chain is completely different. That’s why simply comparing historical patterns can be very dangerous. The real issue is that, in an era where global central banks are out of sync and liquidity patterns are fragmented, individual and institutional demand for stable assets has upgraded—not just for preservation of value, but also for control. This also explains why decentralized stablecoins have moved from niche topics to mainstream investors' attention over the past few years. They are not just simple copies of traditional USD, but offer an alternative—autonomy, transparency, and independence from single policies.
In the current environment of sustained high macro uncertainty, this demand will only grow stronger.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnChainDetective
· 7h ago
nah this "31% dump = rate hike" correlation is lazy analysis tbh... traced the wallet movements and the real catalyst was always different each time. march's liquidation cascade had nothing to do with boj, that was just technical rebalancing after btc's 200% run. people see surface-level macro news and think they've cracked the code, typical behavior honestly
Reply0
OptionWhisperer
· 11h ago
Another chart flooding the group at night, just a different logical chain; rate hikes are not the real culprit.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBard
· 16h ago
Once again, the argument that "interest rate hikes = plummeting" is really getting old. Every time, someone uses this as a universal explanation, but the underlying logic is worlds apart.
View OriginalReply0
MonkeySeeMonkeyDo
· 16h ago
I see through this move of big players switching to stablecoins; they just don't want to be manipulated by the central bank.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 16h ago
The big players' moves this time are really impressive. While others panic, he's strategically positioning himself. That's the information gap.
Late at night, a data chart showing "Cryptocurrency markets have all fallen 31% after three rate hikes in Japan" circulated across major communities, but one big holder acted quickly—converting several million assets into decentralized stablecoins. This is not a panic sell to cut losses, but rather a preparation for the upcoming market turbulence.
With the Bank of Japan's rate hike imminent, the market is once again filled with familiar panic. Does a rate hike mean a crash? This logic seems straightforward, but in reality, it hides a huge cognitive misconception. The true culprit behind each decline is actually different. The recent adjustments in the crypto market over the past few years reveal the truth only upon careful analysis.
The plunge in March last year was fundamentally a technical correction after Bitcoin soared from 24,000 to 73,000 within half a year—that was a necessary pullback. Japan's first rate hike in 17 years? That was just the last straw that broke the camel's back.
By July, the situation became more complex. Japan's rate hike coincided with worsening US unemployment data, and once recession expectations appeared, the global market began a collective deleveraging. That was the real "double kill."
In January this year, the driving force shifted again to geopolitical risks—the new government's policy expectations disrupted the market rhythm.
It may seem that all these are caused by rate hikes, but the actual logical chain is completely different. That’s why simply comparing historical patterns can be very dangerous. The real issue is that, in an era where global central banks are out of sync and liquidity patterns are fragmented, individual and institutional demand for stable assets has upgraded—not just for preservation of value, but also for control. This also explains why decentralized stablecoins have moved from niche topics to mainstream investors' attention over the past few years. They are not just simple copies of traditional USD, but offer an alternative—autonomy, transparency, and independence from single policies.
In the current environment of sustained high macro uncertainty, this demand will only grow stronger.