Curious about Mayhem's design choices—why wasn't a snowball mechanism integrated into the protocol? There seem to be clear advantages: it could have enabled zero-fee automated market making while simultaneously driving volume growth. The dual benefits are worth considering. A snowball mode feature could be a game-changer for the platform's competitiveness in the DeFi space.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoMotivatorvip
· 12h ago
The snowball mechanism sounds good, but can it really solve the liquidity problem? It feels like another overhyped concept...
View OriginalReply0
DaoGovernanceOfficervip
· 12h ago
ngl, empirically speaking the snowball mechanism trade-offs probably aren't as clean as they sound. what's the actual gas cost-benefit analysis here? token-weighted voting on this would be chef's kiss but let's see if governance actually addresses it lol
Reply0
IfIWereOnChainvip
· 12h ago
The snowball mechanism sounds good, but can it really achieve zero fees? It feels like there are pitfalls everywhere.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosophervip
· 13h ago
The snowball mechanism sounds good, but can it really run with zero fees? I'm afraid there might be hidden costs.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)