#以太坊行情解读 Have you ever thought about the fact that we have become accustomed to a type of transaction in the digital world—exchanging privacy for convenience? But should privacy really be a commodity that is traded?



Perhaps not. Just like air and water, privacy should be the infrastructure of digital existence, not an added feature.

A blockchain project is trying to redefine this logic. Internet Computer (ICP) does not simply lock privacy but completely transforms it from the protocol level—making privacy the default setting of the system.

How is it done specifically? Mainly three directions:

VetKeys technology puts cryptographic keys back in the hands of users, making on-chain operations truly belong to you, and you have the final say on authorizations.

SEV-type hardware upgrades protect the computation process of smart contracts at the chip level. Your data will not be exposed during calculations — this is true hardware-level privacy.

Privacy-native smart contracts break the old notion that "blockchain = complete transparency." Sensitive data can safely exist on-chain while maintaining privacy.

These solutions point to a common destination: making privacy the starting point of the architecture, rather than an afterthought. Just as wires must be insulated and pipes must be leak-proof, future digital systems should treat privacy as a fundamental consideration from the initial design stage.

The path paved by ICP is very clear—your data sovereignty is no longer an option, but rather the foundation of everything.

What do you think? Do you want an internet with "built-in privacy" or continue to accept the current situation of "optional privacy"? I would like to hear your thoughts.
ETH1.6%
ICP-1.41%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseLandladyvip
· 8h ago
Sounds good, but can this ICP trap really be implemented? It still feels like a pipe dream. To be honest, I've long become numb to privacy issues, as the data is in the hands of big companies anyway. Have you heard of VetKeys? It feels like jargon again; can it be explained in plain language? Hardware-level privacy is indeed a bull, but can ordinary people actually use it? Rather than bragging about built-in privacy, it would be better to improve transaction speed first.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesisvip
· 8h ago
On-chain data shows that this round of ICP operations is indeed interesting, focusing on privacy at the protocol layer rather than applying patches afterwards, which I agree with. However, the implementation details of VetKeys depend on the specific parameters at the time of contract deployment... It is worth noting that such solutions often tend to become marketing gimmicks.
View OriginalReply0
DataOnlookervip
· 8h ago
It sounds quite ideal, but can VetKeys really be implemented? It feels like just another impressive-sounding technical solution.
View OriginalReply0
ValidatorVikingvip
· 8h ago
looks good on paper but where's the battle-tested track record on this actually holding up under real network load?
Reply0
GateUser-0717ab66vip
· 8h ago
Sounds good, but can ICP really be implemented? It always feels like just a big pie in the sky. --- I quite agree with the idea of privacy as infrastructure, but the reality is that everyone is selling data for convenience, which can't be changed. --- VetKeys and SEV sound amazing, but will it get stuck when actually running? Let's wait until it's implemented to see. --- The problem is that users don't really care how privacy is achieved, as long as it works. Can ICP do that? --- Hardware-level privacy does have some merits, but balancing cost and performance is another matter. --- It sounds good, but on-chain data is inherently transparent. Isn't that contradictory? --- I just want to know if this ICP solution will be adopted by the mainstream; otherwise, no matter how good the design is, it would be useless.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)