#大户持仓动态 A recent move by the UK is worth noting - it has officially confirmed the legal status of crypto assets as property. This is a significant Favourable Information for mainstream cryptocurrencies like $ETH, providing institutional investors with reassurance. Previously, pension funds and hedge funds had been waiting and watching, but now that the regulatory framework is clear, their willingness to allocate is noticeably on the rise. The advancement of Ethereum Spot ETF is the most direct reflection of this trend - you will find that more and more professional funds are beginning to take this field seriously.
The macro aspect is more complex. The competition for the position of the Federal Reserve Chairman is intense, and the policy ideas of different candidates vary significantly. If the dovish camp comes to power? Ample liquidity makes risk assets attractive. If the hawkish camp takes the stage? The market may face a situation of tight liquidity. The transmission effect of these policy signals on the cryptocurrency market is quite evident—you need to keep a close eye on these changes.
The global economic environment in 2026 will also not be simple. The inversion of US Treasury yields has lasted for quite a long time, combined with the adjustment pressure in the job market, fluctuations in consumer credit data, and political factors such as the midterm elections. The multiple variables stacking up will definitely increase market uncertainty. The link between the encryption market and macroeconomics, as well as the policy cycle, is becoming tighter and tighter; it is no longer an era where a single factor can determine the direction.
From the composition of market participants, institutional funds have become important incremental buyers of encryption assets, and the overall pattern of the market is shifting from a purely speculative cycle to a more fundamental and professional institutional-scale migration. This means that the market is becoming more logical and increasingly focusing on fundamentals. For retail investors, it is more necessary to be rational at this time—do thorough homework and allocate according to their own risk tolerance, rather than being led by the hotspots. The performance of popular coins like $XRP and $SOL can be used to observe the rhythm of market hotspot rotation, but this is just a reference, not an investment guide.
Which do you think has a greater impact on the cryptocurrency market, the current regulatory dynamics or macro policies?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CounterIndicator
· 7h ago
The clear regulatory framework is indeed favourable information, but to be honest, the macro policy is the real potential bomb. The choice of the Fed chairman could directly rewrite the market rhythm.
It's true that institutions entering the market is a trend, but what I'm more concerned about is when this wave of liquidity will start to tighten. We'll see who is still swimming naked then.
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 7h ago
The regulatory framework must be established for institutions to dare to enter the market; this is a necessity. No matter how much macro policy is twisted, without legal status, everything is in vain.
The entry of institutions is a long-term Favourable Information, but short-term Fluctuation still depends on how the Fed plays with Liquidity.
To be honest, retail investors are getting dizzy from the hot topic rotation; it’s more practical to directly observe the Holdings of Large Investors.
Regulation > Macro, after all, only with legal protection can we confidently allocate, and the policy cycle can be slowly endured.
This step by the UK has indeed given institutions confidence; pension funds have been waiting for this signal.
With the yield curve inversion of U.S. Treasuries, encryption might become a Hedging tool, which is rather Favourable.
Everyone is chasing hot topics, but they don't realize that institutions have long been calculating the fundamentals.
Macro policy changes quickly, but once the regulatory framework is determined, it tends to be relatively stable; in the long run, the latter is more important.
The influx of institutional funds indicates that the market is growing, and the small tricks of retail investors are becoming less effective.
The advancement of Ethereum Spot ETF is a signal; large funds are indeed taking this seriously.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a180694b
· 7h ago
A clear regulatory framework allows institutions to act, but the real determinants of rise and fall still depend on how the Fed makes its choices.
---
Hey, wait a minute, the UK confirming the legal status of assets... could it just be a paper-based favourable information, with actual operations still being a mess?
---
Dovish vs hawkish, it's as thrilling as betting on who can come to power, the crypto market is really being pinned down by macro policies right now.
---
Institutional entry is a good thing but also troublesome; the retail investor's period of gains is really over, and following trends now basically just means giving away money.
---
The inversion of US Treasuries has been going on for so long, it feels like the entire market is waiting for a turning point, 2026 might be quite tumultuous.
---
To be honest, both regulation and macro factors are important, but I think the impact of macro policy is more direct... who the Fed Chair is will directly determine the direction of liquidity.
---
The ETH spot ETF advancement is quite solid, but don't let this favourable information cloud your judgment; you still have to guard against macro pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
EntryPositionAnalyst
· 8h ago
The recent actions by the UK have indeed given institutions a strong boost, but I think it really depends on who the market maker is on the Fed side; liquidity is the key.
Macro policy will definitely have a greater impact; regulation is just a framework, and policy is the flow of money.
Don't talk to me about rational allocation; I see that large investors have already been buying the dip on ETH. It's too late to talk about fundamentals now.
This round of institutional entry has indeed changed the landscape, but if retail investors want to follow suit? Let's wait and see what happens with US Treasuries first.
It feels like the pace of ETF advancement is even faster than the regulatory framework; there must be big funds driving it behind the scenes.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaWhisperer
· 8h ago
The regulatory framework clarifies that institutions dare to take action, but to put it bluntly, it still depends on how the Fed operates... one piece of favourable information can't hold up against liquidity tightening.
#大户持仓动态 A recent move by the UK is worth noting - it has officially confirmed the legal status of crypto assets as property. This is a significant Favourable Information for mainstream cryptocurrencies like $ETH, providing institutional investors with reassurance. Previously, pension funds and hedge funds had been waiting and watching, but now that the regulatory framework is clear, their willingness to allocate is noticeably on the rise. The advancement of Ethereum Spot ETF is the most direct reflection of this trend - you will find that more and more professional funds are beginning to take this field seriously.
The macro aspect is more complex. The competition for the position of the Federal Reserve Chairman is intense, and the policy ideas of different candidates vary significantly. If the dovish camp comes to power? Ample liquidity makes risk assets attractive. If the hawkish camp takes the stage? The market may face a situation of tight liquidity. The transmission effect of these policy signals on the cryptocurrency market is quite evident—you need to keep a close eye on these changes.
The global economic environment in 2026 will also not be simple. The inversion of US Treasury yields has lasted for quite a long time, combined with the adjustment pressure in the job market, fluctuations in consumer credit data, and political factors such as the midterm elections. The multiple variables stacking up will definitely increase market uncertainty. The link between the encryption market and macroeconomics, as well as the policy cycle, is becoming tighter and tighter; it is no longer an era where a single factor can determine the direction.
From the composition of market participants, institutional funds have become important incremental buyers of encryption assets, and the overall pattern of the market is shifting from a purely speculative cycle to a more fundamental and professional institutional-scale migration. This means that the market is becoming more logical and increasingly focusing on fundamentals. For retail investors, it is more necessary to be rational at this time—do thorough homework and allocate according to their own risk tolerance, rather than being led by the hotspots. The performance of popular coins like $XRP and $SOL can be used to observe the rhythm of market hotspot rotation, but this is just a reference, not an investment guide.
Which do you think has a greater impact on the cryptocurrency market, the current regulatory dynamics or macro policies?