There is a blockchain project called Kite, specifically designed for AI agents. Recently, I found their technical solutions quite interesting.
The core innovation is the consensus mechanism. They did not follow the trend of using PoW (which is energy-intensive) or PoS (which is prone to centralization), but instead designed PoAI—simply put, it uses the computing power of AI for verification work. The computational power contributed by developers is not wasted but becomes part of network security, thereby incentivizing ecological participation and addressing the pain points of traditional consensus mechanisms.
In terms of compatibility, Kite has made EVM adaptations, allowing Ethereum applications to theoretically be directly migrated. But they didn't stop there; they customized optimizations based on actual AI needs — low-latency trading and second-level confirmations, among others. The data speaks: 1 second block time, transaction fees as low as $0.000001, over 1.01 million transactions processed, and a total circulation of $1.7 billion. This performance indeed addresses the pain points for frequent interactions of AI agents. The chain also integrates stablecoins, so automatic payments between machines no longer need to take detours.
The technical architecture features a three-layer identity design that is worth noting. The user layer, proxy layer, and session layer are responsible for different authentication and isolation tasks. This layered logic not only enhances security but also effectively isolates data flows during multi-proxy collaboration, preventing the interconnection of sensitive information.
In addition, programmable governance allows on-chain rules to be flexibly adjusted according to agent needs, which is definitely a plus for the iteration of the agent ecosystem. Overall, Kite's design concept is indeed a rethinking of what blockchain should look like in the AI era.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OffchainOracle
· 19h ago
The PoAI idea is indeed brilliant, turning computing power into a security mechanism is really clever.
---
A transaction fee of 0.000001 USD? If that's true, I would go all in.
---
Another savior? Let's wait and see, don't get played for suckers.
---
The three-layer identity isolation is quite hardcore, indeed needed for multi-agent scenarios.
---
EVM compatibility and optimization, this is serious work.
---
I love the integration of stablecoins that saves the detour, automatic payments are the way to go.
---
1.01 million transactions with 1.7 billion in circulation, the data is good but how's the ecological activity?
---
Innovation in consensus mechanism is one thing, the key is whether the on-chain ecology will really take off.
---
If this can truly achieve second-level confirmations, AI agents' frequent interactions will indeed be smooth.
---
Programmability in governance sounds good, just afraid it becomes a tool for power struggles.
View OriginalReply0
DiamondHands
· 19h ago
I hadn't thought of this idea of PoAI, where computing power directly translates to security; this logic is quite extreme.
There is a blockchain project called Kite, specifically designed for AI agents. Recently, I found their technical solutions quite interesting.
The core innovation is the consensus mechanism. They did not follow the trend of using PoW (which is energy-intensive) or PoS (which is prone to centralization), but instead designed PoAI—simply put, it uses the computing power of AI for verification work. The computational power contributed by developers is not wasted but becomes part of network security, thereby incentivizing ecological participation and addressing the pain points of traditional consensus mechanisms.
In terms of compatibility, Kite has made EVM adaptations, allowing Ethereum applications to theoretically be directly migrated. But they didn't stop there; they customized optimizations based on actual AI needs — low-latency trading and second-level confirmations, among others. The data speaks: 1 second block time, transaction fees as low as $0.000001, over 1.01 million transactions processed, and a total circulation of $1.7 billion. This performance indeed addresses the pain points for frequent interactions of AI agents. The chain also integrates stablecoins, so automatic payments between machines no longer need to take detours.
The technical architecture features a three-layer identity design that is worth noting. The user layer, proxy layer, and session layer are responsible for different authentication and isolation tasks. This layered logic not only enhances security but also effectively isolates data flows during multi-proxy collaboration, preventing the interconnection of sensitive information.
In addition, programmable governance allows on-chain rules to be flexibly adjusted according to agent needs, which is definitely a plus for the iteration of the agent ecosystem. Overall, Kite's design concept is indeed a rethinking of what blockchain should look like in the AI era.