$PI What I am about to say may precisely hit the core of community controversy👇

Arguing about so-called scams? Garbage? Pump and dump?
Do you all agree? Anyway, I do not:
1. The project team has been self-sufficient without any fees for 6 years, with no capital input required throughout, solely supported by advertising revenue to cover global server costs, KYC free certification, and other operational expenses. No fundraising, no cashing out, even miners mine without mining machines or electricity consumption. Participation is entirely voluntary. Where is the “scam”?
2. The white paper clearly states that Pi is a social experiment on the blockchain aimed at ordinary people, focusing on low-threshold inclusive finance exploration. It is not a guaranteed profit investment. Complaints mostly come from speculators who believe in unofficial sky-high consensus rumors, overestimate short-term gains, and blame others when expectations are not met. Essentially, it’s a matter of cognitive bias and inability to distinguish true from false information, with no relation to the project team.
3. Cryptocurrency trading is inherently volatile. The core of mining is to wait for reflection and observe ecological implementation. Pi’s current narrow fluctuation is the result of genuine market competition, not manipulation by the project team. Voluntary participation means accepting two possible outcomes of the experiment: profit is a happy outcome, and failure should be acknowledged. There’s no need for emotional complaints or blame-shifting.