The backend has recently been flooded with Ethereum-related issues. Most people are struggling: should I cut now or wait? Honestly, these kinds of questions usually reflect a lack of understanding of the current technical structure.
Ethereum is quietly forming a "reverse head and shoulders" pattern — it's not a complicated concept; simply put, it involves three lows and a neckline. The left shoulder and head are now clearly in place, and the right shoulder is almost complete. The key point is this: once the price breaks through the neckline (around $3000 resistance level), according to pattern measurement rules, the expected increase is at least equal to the distance from the neckline to the low of the head, which roughly corresponds to $4400. The target I calculated using on-chain data previously matches perfectly, and this is no coincidence.
More importantly, on-chain data is supporting this view. Long-term holders' selling has collapsed to 95%, meaning the supply of coins is becoming increasingly scarce. Many people ask me why technical patterns sometimes work well and sometimes don't? Ultimately, it depends on whether the market has sufficient capital support. Currently, the technical analysis and on-chain data are "resonating in sync," which significantly increases the reliability of this trend by 80%.
Some are worried about what to do if the price can't break through $3000. That is indeed a question worth considering. But in the context of dual signals resonating, the probability has already tilted clearly.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WenAirdrop
· 12-26 16:51
Inverse head and shoulders + on-chain data double resonance, this wave feels really different.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 12-26 16:41
The inverse head and shoulders this time indeed succeeded. On-chain data doesn't lie, and a breakout with 95% chip scarcity is the real deal.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggar
· 12-26 16:41
If this inverse head and shoulders truly breaks out, I'll go all in directly.
View OriginalReply0
Blockchainiac
· 12-26 16:33
The reverse head and shoulders pattern has been talked about so many times, is this really the breakout?
On-chain data is so strong, why do I still feel a bit hesitant...
While the chips are scarce, I'm just worried about the moment of dumping
Being in sync and resonating sounds right, but what if $3000 can't be broken?
Just waiting to watch the show, but what if it's only "approaching completion"?
View OriginalReply0
PensionDestroyer
· 12-26 16:30
Inverse head and shoulders are back again, and this time the on-chain data is really intense.
Cut? You probably haven't looked at the on-chain data yet.
There's still a chance if it doesn't break $3000; with dual signals supporting, the probability is much higher.
Honestly, if you don't understand the pattern, just don't ask—do your own research.
Long-term holders are almost clearing out; just listen to the signal that chips are scarce.
I believe in the $4400 target; the previous data alignment was right there.
View OriginalReply0
ZeroRushCaptain
· 12-26 16:25
Here we go again... Inverse head and shoulders, on-chain data, synchronized resonance... You speak so confidently, just like last time, and what was the result? A 50% cut.
The backend has recently been flooded with Ethereum-related issues. Most people are struggling: should I cut now or wait? Honestly, these kinds of questions usually reflect a lack of understanding of the current technical structure.
Ethereum is quietly forming a "reverse head and shoulders" pattern — it's not a complicated concept; simply put, it involves three lows and a neckline. The left shoulder and head are now clearly in place, and the right shoulder is almost complete. The key point is this: once the price breaks through the neckline (around $3000 resistance level), according to pattern measurement rules, the expected increase is at least equal to the distance from the neckline to the low of the head, which roughly corresponds to $4400. The target I calculated using on-chain data previously matches perfectly, and this is no coincidence.
More importantly, on-chain data is supporting this view. Long-term holders' selling has collapsed to 95%, meaning the supply of coins is becoming increasingly scarce. Many people ask me why technical patterns sometimes work well and sometimes don't? Ultimately, it depends on whether the market has sufficient capital support. Currently, the technical analysis and on-chain data are "resonating in sync," which significantly increases the reliability of this trend by 80%.
Some are worried about what to do if the price can't break through $3000. That is indeed a question worth considering. But in the context of dual signals resonating, the probability has already tilted clearly.