2025-12-26 16:23:52

与其等着钱包被攻击后再慌张补救，不如提前把架构问题理清楚。太多项目和用户都是等出事了才开始反思安全设计，到那时已经亡羊补牢。钱包的安全防护、多签方案、权限隔离这些基础建设，早做总比晚做强。

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationSurvivor

· 8h ago

Oh no, it's another case of armchair quarterbacking... But it's also quite true. I've seen too many big players get liquidated because they were lazy.

View OriginalReply0

DefiVeteran

· 8h ago

Damn, those words are so blunt. I'm the kind of person who only reacts after something happens... --- Multi-signature really needs to be set up early, or else you'll lose everything in one cut. --- That's right, but the reality is most people won't do it in advance; they have to suffer a loss before they understand. --- Clarifying the architecture issues is not easy, most small coins don't have the budget for that. --- Wait, how should we implement permission isolation to ensure safety? Looking for expert guidance. --- The four words "mend the pen after sheep are lost" hit me hard. Is it still possible to switch wallets now? --- The earlier, the better. I've heard this so many times, but the execution is poor. --- The key question is how many people actually manage their own wallets? Most still keep their coins on exchanges.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainArchaeologist